What is the quality of participatory renewable energy planning in Europe? A comparative analysis of innovative practices in 25 projects. (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stober, Dina; Suškevičs, Monika; Eiter, Sebastian; Müller, Stefanie; Martinát, Stanislav; Buchecker, Matthias
• Is Part Of: Energy research & social science. Volume 71(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: Assessment -- Energy transition -- Inclusiveness -- Participation level and techniques -- Rationales -- Timing; Power resources -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101804
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-6296

Abstract

Highlights: We conducted an inventory of innovative participatory practices. We compared practices in 25 projects in three supra-national European regions. The quality of top-level participation seems to be high but varies between regions. A shift from instrumental to substantive rationales might increase acceptance. The regional context is important when assessing projects. Abstract: There is widespread agreement that society must urgently go over to renewable energy and that effective participation is crucial for a sustainable transition. Recent literature highlights that the quality of participatory planning is decisive for the acceptance of renewable energy technologies. However, social science research on the issue is dominated by single case studies and the quality of the participatory processes has been rarely studied across wider regional contexts. We present the results of a comparative qualitative inventory of innovative practices from 25 projects in 12 countries in three supra-national European regions. We assessed participation quality according to three analytical dimensions: rationale, inclusiveness, and participation level. An instrumental rationale, broad inclusiveness, and a participation level of consulting or informing was a combination that was commonly perceived as an innovative participatory practice in most regional contexts. We found a tendency towards more advanced practices in Western Europe, compared to Southern, and Eastern Europe. However, practices that were considered to be innovative in the latter regions still provide important lessons within their geographical contexts.