Surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection: an international survey among surgeons and pathologists. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Groen, Jesse V.; Stommel, Martijn W.J.; Sarasqueta, Arantza F.; Besselink, Marc G.; Brosens, Lodewijk A.A.; van Eijck, Casper H.J.; Molenaar, Isaac Q.; Verheij, Joanne; de Vos-Geelen, Judith; Wasser, Martin N.; Bonsing, Bert A.; Mieog, J. Sven D.
• Is Part Of: HPB. Volume 23:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.362005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1365-182X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The aim of this survey was to gain insights in the current surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with portal–superior mesenteric vein resection (VR). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify international expert surgeons (N = 150) and pathologists (N = 40) who published relevant studies between 2009 and 2019. These experts and Dutch surgeons (N = 17) and pathologists (N = 20) were approached to complete an online survey. Results: Overall, 76 (46%) surgeons and 37 (62%) pathologists completed the survey. Most surgeons (71%) estimated that preoperative imaging corresponded correctly with intraoperative findings of venous involvement in 50–75% of patients. An increased complication risk following VR was expected by 55% of surgeons, mainly after Type 4 (segmental resection-venous conduit anastomosis). Most surgeons (61%) preferred Type 3 (segmental resection-primary anastomosis). Most surgeons (75%) always perform the VR themselves. Standard postoperative imaging for patency control was performed by 54% of surgeons and 39% adjusted thromboprophylaxis following VR. Most pathologists (76%) always assessed tumor infiltration in the resected vein and only 54% of pathologists always assess the resection margins of the vein itself. Variation in assessment of tumor infiltration depth was observed. Conclusion: This international survey showed variation in the surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with venous involvement. This highlights the lack of evidence and emphasizes the need for research on imaging modalities to improve patient selection for VR, surgical techniques, postoperative management and standardization of the pathological assessment.