More continuous flow, better learning? The effect of aortic valve opening in patients with left ventricular assist device. Issue 5 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Karahan, Mehmet; Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit; Kervan, Umit; Sert, Dogan Emre; Erdogan Bakar, Emel; Aygun, Emre; Tola, Muharrem; Demirkan, Burcu; Mungan, Semra; Catav, Zeki; Pac, Mustafa
• Is Part Of: International journal of artificial organs. Volume 44:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 325
• Page End: 331
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Left ventricular assist device -- neurocognitive functions -- aortic valve opening; Artificial organs -- Periodicals; 617.956
• DOI: 10.1177/0391398820963284
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0391-3988

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze neurocognitive function in patients who underwent continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Material and Method: This cross-sectional study included three groups: LVAD ( n = 31), heart failure patients ( n = 26), and healthy volunteers ( n = 27). The Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Judgement of Line Orientation Test (JLOT), Trail Making Test (TMT), Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (SCWIT), Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), Symbol-Digit Modality Test (SDMT) were used to assess the neurocognitive functions. Data were analyzed at a median 12 (3–47) months after LVAD implantation. The LVAD patients were also divided by aortic valve opening (AVO) into three subgroups as "closed" ( n = 9), "1–6" ( n = 8) and "7–10" ( n = 14) opening per ten beats and data were re-analyzed accordingly. Results: There was no significant difference among the groups according to SCWIT, JLOT, SDMT, TMT, and VFT scores. Post-hoc analyzes of RAVLT scores showed significant differences between the LVAD and the other two groups in favor of the LVAD group. Also, the patients with AVO "7–10" the response times were longer and learning scores were found to be lower than those without AVO. Conclusion: With continuous-flow LVAD, neurocognitive functions were not impaired. The learning performance was better in cases where there was no AVO and flow was completely device dependent. We may speculate that neurocognitive functions are not worsening with continuous cerebral blood flow and even it may improve learning performance.