A Performance analysis of the Claridge-Culp-Liu dehumidification process: A novel approach for drying moist air based on membrane separation, vacuum compression and sub-atmospheric condensation. (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Claridge, David E.; Culp, Charles; Pate, Michael; Haberl, Jeff; Bynum, John; Tanskyi, Oleksandr; Schaff, Francesco
• Is Part Of: International journal of refrigeration. Volume 122(2021)
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 200
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: Air conditioning -- Membrane separation -- Sensible cooling -- Latent cooling -- Membrane dehumidification; Conditionnement d'air -- Séparation membranaire -- Refroidissement sensible -- Refroidissement latent -- Déshumidification membranaire; Refrigeration and refrigerating machinery -- Periodicals; 621.56
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.11.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-7007

Abstract

Abstract: This paper covers a basic model for analyzing the performance of the Claridge-Culp-Liu dehumidification process. The fundamental process efficiency limit for dehumidification is close to COPCarnot, but for the eight dehumidification cases examined, the limiting or ideal energy use required is 26% to 56% that of a Carnot condensing system as shown in an earlier paper. The model presented in this paper is used to show the membrane system performance reduction caused by finite membrane area, finite water vapor permeance, non-zero air permeance, non-zero system air pressure drop, non-ideal compressors, vacuum pumps, and condensers. The performance of a "conservative" membrane system based on the use of existing components is computed for eight specific conditions along with that of a "target" system that assumes expected component performance after additional future component development. The "conservative" membrane system would use 36% to 66% as much energy as a system with a COP=7 chiller to produce the same dehumidification for the eight cases examined while the "target" system would use 15% to 40% the energy of a system with a COP=7 chiller. In addition to the significant energy reduction over conventional technology, the membrane system offers the advantages of: 1) no HFC refrigerant use; 2) direct isothermal control over humidity ratio setpoint; 3) maximum capacity occurs at design conditions; and 4) system generates pure water extracted from air as a by-product.