Speech Pathology Services Are Integral, but Underutilized in Tracheostomy Rehabilitation. Issue 2 (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davis, Stephanie; Weyh, Ashleigh M.; Salman, Salam O.; Madbak, Firas; Fraker, John T.
• Is Part Of: Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. Volume 14:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 110
• Page End: 118
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: tracheostomy -- speech language pathology -- airway management -- trauma -- oncology; Face -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery; Face -- Wounds and injuries; Maxilla -- Surgery; Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries; Maxillofacial Injuries -- Periodicals; Craniocerebral Trauma -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 617.522
• DOI: 10.1177/1943387520948381
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1943-3875

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: Speech language pathology (SLP) is an underutilized but important component in rehabilitation after tracheostomy. The purpose of this study was to determine rates of SLP utilization and to streamline tracheostomy decannulation to be more efficient and safer through increased utilization of SLP. Methods: Adult patients who underwent tracheostomy from April 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was completion of any SLP evaluation after tracheostomy, and secondary outcomes were duration from surgery to evaluation, speaking valve and swallow study utilization, downsize and decannulation rates, mean duration of cannulation, and complications. Results: A total of 255 subjects were included, where 197 (77.3%) underwent SLP evaluation. A minority received a speaking valve (33.7%), while approximately half underwent a swallow study (52.9%). There was a delay in SLP evaluation, with mean duration from surgery to SLP evaluation of 5.9 ± 8.0 days. There was consistent improvement in downsize and decannulation rates in all cohorts that utilized SLP services. Tracheostomy indication of head and neck cancer, trauma, completing a successful swallow study conferred increased odds of eventual decannulation, while obesity and tracheostomy history conferred lower odds. An interdisciplinary decannulation pathway was created, based on literature review and results, to assist in decision-making while progressing toward decannulation. Conclusion: Speech language pathologists are underutilized for rehabilitation of tracheostomy patients, where they are able to offer many skills to diagnose, treat, manage, and troubleshoot, as patients advance through the decannulation process.