The Fate of Bone Marrow Lesions After Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Comparison Between Knees With Primary Osteoarthritis and Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures. Issue 6 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choi, Han Gyeol; Kim, Joo Sung; Yoo, Hyun Jin; Jung, You Sun; Lee, Yong Seuk
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 49:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1551
• Page End: 1560
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) -- open wedge high tibial osteotomy -- bone marrow lesions; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/03635465211002160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) is characterized by a subchondral lesion that may lead to end-stage osteoarthritis (OA). In patients who have SIFK in a precollapse state with varus malalignment, a joint-preserving technique such as open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) should be considered. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of OWHTO in primary OA and SIFK-dominant OA by clinical and radiological evaluations including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence 3. Methods: A total of 33 SIFK-dominant OA knees and 66 with primary OA that underwent biplanar OWHTO between March 2014 and February 2016 were included after 1:2 propensity score matching. The MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score was used to assess bone marrow lesions (BMLs) preoperatively and at follow-up. The weightbearing line ratio, the hip-knee-ankle angle, and the joint line convergence angle were measured. The clinical outcomes assessed were range of motion, the American Knee Society Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) score. Results: The mean follow-up period was 41.2 ± 12.6 months. The distribution of preoperative BML grade in the SIFK-dominant OA group was significantly higher in both the femur and tibia ( P < .001 and <.001, respectively) than that in the primary OA group. However, the difference was not significant postoperatively (femur, P = .425; tibia, P = .462). In both groups, postoperative BMLs showed significant improvement compared with preoperative BMLs (primary OA [femur, P < .001; tibia, P = .001] and SIFK-dominant OA [femur, P < .001; tibia, P < .001]). The WOMAC pain score was higher in the SIFK-dominant OA group preoperatively (primary OA, 7.0 ± 3.73; SIFK-dominant OA, 9.17 ± 2.6; P = .032) even though it was not different at the final follow-up (primary OA, 2.11 ± 1.7; SIFK-dominant OA, 1.79 ± 1.32; P = .179). Conclusion: OWHTO is an effective procedure not only for primary OA but also for SIFK-dominant OA. OWHTO can improve BMLs, which represent the main pathological feature of SIFK. Therefore, in patients who have SIFK with varus malalignment, OWHTO can be an attractive treatment option for preserving the joint and enhancing subchondral bone healing.