Comparison of Three Instruments for Activity Disability in Acute Ischemic Stroke Survivors. (14th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wu, Qian; Tang, Aijie; Niu, Shuzhen; Jin, Aiping; Liu, Xiaoqing; Zeng, Li; Jiang, Jinxia; Kue, Jennifer; Shi, Yan; Zhu, Xiaoping
• Is Part Of: Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Volume 48:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 94
• Page End: 104
• Publication Date: 2021-01-14
• Subjects: Stroke, -- Activity, -- Disability, -- Modified Rankin scale, -- Modified Barthel index, -- Instrumental ADL, -- NIHSS; Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2020.149
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0317-1671

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Disabilities in physical activity and functional independence affect the early rehabilitation of stroke survivors. Moreover, a good instrument for assessing activity disability allows accurate assessment of physical disability and assists in prognosis determination. Objective: To compare three assessment tools for physical activity in acute-phase stroke survivors. Methods: We conducted this prospective observational study at an affiliated hospital of a Medical University in Shanghai, China, from June 2018 to November 2019. We administered three instruments to all patients during post-stroke days 5–7, including the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and modified Rankin scale (mRs). We analyzed correlations among the aforementioned scales and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) using Spearman's rank-order correlations test. Univariate analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. We used a binary logistic regression model to assess the association between the NIHSS (30 days) and patient-related variables. Finally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the predictive value of the multivariate regression models. Results: There was a high correlation among the three instruments; furthermore, the MBI had a higher correlation with the NIHSS (days 5–7). The NIHSS (day 30) was correlated with thrombolysis. ROC analysis revealed that the mRs-measured disability level had the highest predictive value of short-term stroke severity (30 days). Conclusion: The MBI was the best scale for measuring disability in physical activity, whereas the mRs showed better accuracy in short-term prediction of stroke severity.