Do patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and their own blood glucose meter have better pregnancy outcomes than those not using a glucose meter?. Issue 51 (18th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dong, Wei; Li, Yan; Sun, Jun-jie; Chen, Li-hong; Guo, Jia; Dong, Ling
• Other Names: Perovic. Milan section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 51(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-18
• Subjects: gestational diabetes mellitus -- perinatal outcome -- self-monitoring -- therapeutic compliance; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023793
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: To compare pregnancy outcomes between patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with and without their own blood glucose meter. We conducted a retrospective-cohort study of 835 women with GDM at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Perinatal outcomes of these patients were monitored and collected in the Tianjin Maternal and Child Health System. Each patient was advised by a certified clinical nutritionist regarding dietary analysis and lifestyle recommendations. All pregnant women with GDM were divided into the following 2 groups according to whether they had their own blood glucose meter: women with self-measured blood glucose levels with a routine obstetric examination in the study group (n = 424); and those with non-self-measured blood glucose levels with a double obstetric examination in the control group (n = 411). Maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes were compared between these 2 groups. According to different self-management modes, the women were also divided into eight subgroups to compare blood sugar control and compliance with recommended insulin therapy. The cesarean section rate was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group ( P < .05). The prevalence of large-for-gestational age ( P < .05) and macrosomia was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (both P < .05). The prevalence of appropriate-for-gestational age was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group ( P < .05). Birth weight was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group ( P < .05). The mean times for blood sugar control and from the doctor recommendation for insulin treatment to the patient compliance in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (both P < .05). The proportion of insulin required in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( P < .05). There were no significant differences in the time of controlling blood sugar and compliance among the 4 subgroups of the study group. However, subgroups with a dietary diary in the control group were better. Self-monitoring blood sugar plus a routine obstetric examination can help patients with GDM control blood sugar, even without dietary diaries and treadmills. In addition to increasing the number of obstetric examinations, recording dietary diaries is helpful for controlling blood sugar in patients with GDM who are unwilling to measure blood sugar by themselves.