Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol. Issue 49 (4th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yin, Yongqiang; Zhang, Xu; Zhang, Kaiming; He, Xiang
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 49(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-04
• Subjects: high tibial osteotomy -- medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis -- retrospective -- study protocol -- unicompartmental knee replacement; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023454
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Many clinical studies have been published in the literature to compare the outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), but reached different conclusions. Therefore, the relative merits and demerits of these 2 procedures remain under debate. The purpose of the present protocol was to design a retrospective comparative study to further investigate the clinical effectiveness of HTO compared to UKR in the medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee patients. Methods: This is an observational retrospective research, which prospectively collected the data from several surgeons in our center and utilized the above 2 methods to treat the unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee. In our single hospital, we reviewed unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis patients treated using UKR or HTO from June 2016 to February 2018. For the HTO, its criteria included: patients ⩽65 years of age with separated medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee joint, and the patients' age is equal to or less than 65 years old, patients without the ligament instability. For the UKR, its inclusion criteria contained the osteoarthritis of knee joint, including the isolated medial compartments of knee, but no degenerative changes in lateral compartment, rectifiable varus deformity, and the patients with an intact anterior cruciate ligament. In our cohorts, the clinical investigations of the knee were composed of the objective parameters, which were recorded and then documented through utilizing the Function Score and Orthopedic American Knee Society Knee Score. The extra clinical findings evaluated involved operative time, postoperative requirements of blood transfusion, possible postoperative complications, as well as the range of motion. Conclusion and discussion: The results of this study will provide clinical evidence on appropriate surgical treatment for patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6152).