A comparison of mechanical responses for microbial- and enzyme-induced cemented sand. Issue 4 (27th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ahenkorah, I.; Rahman, M. M.; Karim, M. R.; Teasdale, P. R.
• Is Part Of: Géotechnique letters. Volume 10:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 559
• Page End: 567
• Publication Date: 2020-12-27
• Subjects: ground improvement -- laboratory tests -- soil stabilisation; Geotechnical engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering geology -- Periodicals; 624.151
• DOI: 10.1680/jgele.20.00061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-2543

Abstract

Abstract : The overall effectiveness of bio-cementation techniques such as microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) or enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) can be different due to different sources of urease enzyme and treatment approach used. This paper compares the behaviour of oven-dried MICP and EICP-treated sand from macro- and micro-mechanical point of view with the number of treatment cycles and average calcium carbonate (CaCO3 ) content used as a comparison basis. The results indicate that in both processes, the calcium carbonate content increased with the number of treatment cycles and led to an improvement in strength (unconfined compressive and splitting tensile strength) and stiffness. For similar average calcium carbonate content, EICP-treated samples showed significantly higher splitting tensile strength (compared to MICP) even though a slightly smaller amount of precipitates were observed at particle contacts through scanning electron microscopy. This indicates, besides the average calcium carbonate content, its distribution along the height of the sample is likely to have a significant contribution towards the strength. X-ray powder diffraction and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses confirmed that precipitated calcium carbonate in both types of treatments were mainly calcite crystals with minor traces of aragonite.