Examining the variability in network populations and its role in generative models. (17th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arora, Viplove; Guo, Dali; Dunbar, Katherine D.; Ventresca, Mario
• Editors: Cherifi, Hocine; Rocha, Luis M.; Wasserman, Stanley
• Is Part Of: Network science. Volume 8(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S43
• Page End: S64
• Publication Date: 2020-07-17
• Subjects: Hocine Cheri; network models, -- variability, -- entropy, -- generative models; Social networks -- Research -- Periodicals; System analysis -- Periodicals; System theory -- Periodicals; Computer science -- Periodicals; 003.72
• DOI: 10.1017/nws.2019.63
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-1242

Abstract

Abstract: A principled approach to understand networks is to formulate generative models and infer their parameters from given network data. Due to the scarcity of data in the form of multiple networks that have evolved from the same process, generative models are typically formulated to learn parameters from a single network observation, hence ignoring the natural variability of the "true" process. In this paper, we highlight the importance of variability in evaluating generative models and present two ways of quantifying the variability for a finite set of networks. The first evaluation scheme compares the statistical properties of networks in a dissimilarity space, while the other relies on data-driven entropy measures to compute variability in network populations. Using these measures, we evaluate the ability of four generative models to synthesize networks that capture the variability of the "true" process. Our empirical analysis suggests that generative models fitted for a single network observation fail to capture the variability in the network population. Our work highlights the need for rethinking the way we evaluate the goodness-of-fit of new and existing network models and devising models that are capable of matching the variability of network populations when available.