Cost-effectiveness of case-based training for primary care physicians in evidence-based medicine of patients with coronary heart disease. (29th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Groot-Jensen, Susanne; Kiessling, Anna; Zethraeus, Niklas; Björnstedt-Bennermo, Marie; Henriksson, Peter
• Is Part Of: European journal of preventive cardiology. Volume 23:Number 4(2016)
• Page Start: 420
• Page End: 427
• Publication Date: 2020-08-29
• Subjects: Coronary disease -- secondary prevention -- case-based training -- cost analysis -- quality-adjusted life years -- time trade off method -- quality of health care; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cardiac patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1177/2047487315583798
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-4873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We have shown that a case-based training programme for general practitioners, aimed to implement evidence-based care of patients at very high risk of coronary death, was associated with decreased mortality. In the present study we assessed long-term cost-effectiveness of this programme. Design: Registry-based long-term cost-effectiveness analysis on a clinical trial. Methods: Costs of the programme, health care, drugs and added years of life were included. Costs were adjusted to 2012 level and discounted by 3%. Life-years gained were estimated as the difference between the survival curves of the trial. The effectiveness measure, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs), was constructed by multiplying each life-year with a quality of life weight corresponding to the health status of that year. QALYs were also discounted by 3%. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated as the incremental cost per QALY gained. Results: The number of undiscounted life-years gained was 365 days in the intervention group as compared to control ( p = 0.02). The number of discounted QALYs gained was 0.66. The net increase in total costs was estimated as 17, 862 € when costs of added years of life were included and 4621 € exclusive of these costs. This implied an ICER of 27, 063 € per gained QALY. This ICER is well below commonly used threshold values of the societal willingness to pay for a QALY. Conclusions: The results show that a case-based training programme of general practitioners is a cost-effective way to save years of life in patients with very high risk of coronary death.