IMG-22. A DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR AUTOMATIC POSTERIOR FOSSA PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR SEGMENTATION: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY. (4th December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- IMG-22. A DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR AUTOMATIC POSTERIOR FOSSA PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR SEGMENTATION: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY. (4th December 2020)
- Main Title:
- IMG-22. A DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR AUTOMATIC POSTERIOR FOSSA PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR SEGMENTATION: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
- Authors:
- Tam, Lydia
Lee, Edward
Han, Michelle
Wright, Jason
Chen, Leo
Quon, Jenn
Lober, Robert
Poussaint, Tina
Grant, Gerald
Taylor, Michael
Ramaswamy, Vijay
Ho, Chang
Cheshier, Samuel
Said, Mourad
Vitanza, Nick
Edwards, Michael
Yeom, Kristen - Abstract:
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Brain tumors are the most common solid malignancies in childhood, many of which develop in the posterior fossa (PF). Manual tumor measurements are frequently required to optimize registration into surgical navigation systems or for surveillance of nonresectable tumors after therapy. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), automated MRI-based tumor segmentation is now feasible without requiring manual measurements. Our goal was to create a deep learning model for automated PF tumor segmentation that can register into navigation systems and provide volume output. METHODS: 720 pre-surgical MRI scans from five pediatric centers were divided into training, validation, and testing datasets. The study cohort comprised of four PF tumor types: medulloblastoma, diffuse midline glioma, ependymoma, and brainstem or cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Manual segmentation of the tumors by an attending neuroradiologist served as "ground truth" labels for model training and evaluation. We used 2D Unet, an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network architecture, with a pre-trained ResNet50 encoder. We assessed ventricle segmentation accuracy on a held-out test set using Dice similarity coefficient (0–1) and compared ventricular volume calculation between manual and model-derived segmentations using linear regression. RESULTS: Compared to the ground truth expert human segmentation, overall Dice score for model performance accuracy was 0.83 for automaticAbstract: BACKGROUND: Brain tumors are the most common solid malignancies in childhood, many of which develop in the posterior fossa (PF). Manual tumor measurements are frequently required to optimize registration into surgical navigation systems or for surveillance of nonresectable tumors after therapy. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), automated MRI-based tumor segmentation is now feasible without requiring manual measurements. Our goal was to create a deep learning model for automated PF tumor segmentation that can register into navigation systems and provide volume output. METHODS: 720 pre-surgical MRI scans from five pediatric centers were divided into training, validation, and testing datasets. The study cohort comprised of four PF tumor types: medulloblastoma, diffuse midline glioma, ependymoma, and brainstem or cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Manual segmentation of the tumors by an attending neuroradiologist served as "ground truth" labels for model training and evaluation. We used 2D Unet, an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network architecture, with a pre-trained ResNet50 encoder. We assessed ventricle segmentation accuracy on a held-out test set using Dice similarity coefficient (0–1) and compared ventricular volume calculation between manual and model-derived segmentations using linear regression. RESULTS: Compared to the ground truth expert human segmentation, overall Dice score for model performance accuracy was 0.83 for automatic delineation of the 4 tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional study, we present a deep learning algorithm that automatically delineates PF tumors and outputs volumetric information. Our results demonstrate applied AI that is clinically applicable, potentially augmenting radiologists, neuro-oncologists, and neurosurgeons for tumor evaluation, surveillance, and surgical planning. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 22(2020)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0022-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- iii359
- Page End:
- iii359
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12-04
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.357 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15437.xml