NIMG-23. COMPARISON OF A RADIO-PATHOMIC MODEL VERSUS A RADIOLOGY-ONLY TUMOR SEGMENTATION MODEL FOR THE DETECTION OF INFILTRATIVE TUMOR IN GLIOMA PATIENTS. (9th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bobholz, Samuel; Lowman, Allison; Connelly, Jennifer; Cochran, Elizabeth; Mueller, Wade; McGarry, Sean; Brehler, Michael; Gliszinski, Cassandra; Wilczynski, Anna; LaViolette, Peter
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 2
• Page Start: ii152
• Page End: ii152
• Publication Date: 2020-11-09
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.636
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: This study used large format autopsy tissue samples to compare radio-pathomic maps of brain cancer to a current tumor segmentation algorithm. We hypothesized that an MRI-based machine learning model trained with actual histology rather than radiologist annotations cellularity would 1) improve delineation between tumor and treatment effect, and 2) detect abnormal pathology beyond the contrast-enhancing tumor region. Seventeen patients with pathologically confirmed glioma were included in this study. At autopsy, 43 tissue samples were collected from 17 subjects from whole brain slices sectioned to align with the last axial MRI prior to death. Cellularity was calculated using a color deconvolution on 40X digitized H&E stained slides from the tissue samples. In-house custom software was used to align tissue samples and cellularity information to the FLAIR image using manually defined control points. The DeepMedic algorithm was trained to segment tumors using the BraTs 2017 dataset, and then applied to our patients in order to create automated tumor probability maps. An MRI-based ensemble algorithm using a 5x5 voxel searchlight (input: T1, T1C, FLAIR, ADC) was used to predict cellularity at each voxel, using tissue samples from 14 subjects as ground truth. Both models were applied to 3 withheld test subjects in order to compare tumor probability and cellularity predictions to the pathological ground truth. The mutual information between tumor probability and actual cellularity was 1X10 -15, relatively low compared to the rad-path predicted cellularity (=0.16), despite the tumor prediction model accurately highlighting regions of contrast enhancement. Additionally, the radio-pathomic ensemble model correctly identify regions of hypercellularity beyond the tumor segmentation model as well as regions of within the segmented tumor area. This study demonstrates the utility of training machine learning models with pathological ground truth rather than radiologist annotations for predicting localized tumor information, particularly in the post-treatment stage.