The state of framework development for implementing reasoning mechanisms in smart cyber-physical systems: A literature review. Issue 4 (12th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tepjit, Sirasak; Horváth, Imre; Rusák, Zoltán
• Is Part Of: Journal of computational design and engineering. Volume 6:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 527
• Page End: 541
• Publication Date: 2019-04-12
• Subjects: Cyber-physical systems -- System smartness -- Development framework -- System level reasoning -- Compositionality; Engineering -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Computer-aided design -- Periodicals; Computer-aided design; Engineering -- Data processing; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 620.0042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcde.2019.04.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2288-4300

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Abstract: Smart CPSs (S-CPSs) have been evolving beyond what was identified by the traditional definitions of CPSs. The objective of our research is to investigate the concepts and implementations of reasoning processes for S-CPSs, and more specifically, the frameworks proposed for the fuzzy front end of their reasoning mechanisms. The objectives of the paper are: (i) to analyze the framework concepts and implementations of CPS, (ii) to review the literature concerning system-level reasoning and its enablers from the points of view of the processed knowledge, building awareness, reasoning mechanisms, decision making, and adaptation. Our findings are: (i) awareness and adaptation behaviors are considered as system-level smartness of S-CPSs that are not achieved by traditional design approaches; (ii) model-based and composability approaches insufficiently support the development of reasoning mechanisms for S-CPSs; (iii) frameworks for development of reasoning in S-CPS should support compositional design. Based on the conclusions above, we argue that coping with the challenges of compositionality requires both software-level integration and holistic fusion of knowledge by means of semantic transformations. This entails the need for a multi aspect framework that is able to capture at least conceptual, functional, architectural, informational, interoperation, and behavioral aspects. It needs further investigation if a compositionality enabling framework should appear in the form of a meta-framework (abstract) or in the form of a semantically integrated (concrete) framework.