Predictors of exercise capacity following exercise-based rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure: A meta-regression analysis. (29th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uddin, Jamal; Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe; Lewinter, Christian; Moniruzzaman, Mohammad; Lund, Ken; Tang, Lars H; Taylor, Rod S
• Is Part Of: European journal of preventive cardiology. Volume 23:Number 7(2016)
• Page Start: 683
• Page End: 693
• Publication Date: 2020-08-29
• Subjects: Exercise training -- cardiac rehabilitation -- heart failure -- coronary heart disease -- exercise capacity -- meta-analysis; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cardiac patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1177/2047487315604311
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-4873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the patient, intervention and trial-level factors that may predict exercise capacity following exercise-based rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure. Design: Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of exercise-based rehabilitation were identified from three published systematic reviews. Exercise capacity was pooled across trials using random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression used to examine the association between exercise capacity and a range of patient (e.g. age), intervention (e.g. exercise frequency) and trial (e.g. risk of bias) factors. Results: 55 trials (61 exercise-control comparisons, 7553 patients) were included. Following exercise-based rehabilitation compared to control, overall exercise capacity was on average 0.95 (95% CI: 0.76–1.41) standard deviation units higher, and in trials reporting maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) was 3.3 ml/kg.min −1 (95% CI: 2.6–4.0) higher. There was evidence of a high level of statistical heterogeneity across trials ( I 2 statistic > 50%). In multivariable meta-regression analysis, only exercise intervention intensity was found to be significantly associated with VO2 max ( P = 0.04); those trials with the highest average exercise intensity had the largest mean post-rehabilitation VO2 max compared to control. Conclusions: We found considerable heterogeneity across randomized controlled trials in the magnitude of improvement in exercise capacity following exercise-based rehabilitation compared to control among patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure. Whilst higher exercise intensities were associated with a greater level of post-rehabilitation exercise capacity, there was no strong evidence to support other intervention, patient or trial factors to be predictive.