Pain and discomfort in closure of femoral access coronary angiography. The CLOSuredEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) pain sub study. (1st June 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pain and discomfort in closure of femoral access coronary angiography. The CLOSuredEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) pain sub study. (1st June 2014)
- Main Title:
- Pain and discomfort in closure of femoral access coronary angiography. The CLOSuredEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) pain sub study
- Authors:
- Sindberg, Birthe
Schou, Mia
Hansen, Lotte
Christiansen, Karen Juelsgaard
Jørgensen, Kristina Søgaard
Søltoft, Marianne
Holm, Niels Ramsing
Maeng, Michael
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Lassen, Jens Flensted - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Pain and discomfort in relation to vascular closure are the predominant patient complaints after coronary angiography (CAG). No large-scale randomized studies have evaluated pain and discomfort after CAG with access site closure by manual compression versus a vascular closure device (VCD). Aim: To compare pain and discomfort after femoral artery closure by manual compression versus FemoSeal® VCD. Methods: The study is a sub study to the CLOSE-UP study, a randomized, single centre comparison of FemoSeal ® VCD versus manual compression after CAG. Pain and discomfort score was assessed immediately after the closure procedure, at time for mobilization, at discharge and after 14 days. Results: 1014 patients were included and 1001 patients entered analysis. In-hospital follow-up was obtained for all patients and 14-day follow-up was completed for 96% of patients. The closure procedure lasted 1 (1–1) min in the FemoSeal ® VCD group and 8 (6–10) min in the manual compression group. Pain and discomfort score at the procedure was significantly higher in the FemoSeal ® VCD group. No differences in pain and discomfort were detected after leaving the catheterization laboratory. Conclusion: Closure of femoral access after CAG by the FemoSeal ® VCD was associated with significantly more pain and discomfort compared with closure by manual compression. No difference in pain and discomfort was found at follow-up.
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cardiovascular nursing. Volume 13:Number 3(2014)
- Journal:
- European journal of cardiovascular nursing
- Issue:
- Volume 13:Number 3(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 13, Issue 3 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0013-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 221
- Page End:
- 226
- Publication Date:
- 2014-06-01
- Subjects:
- Manual compression -- vascular closure device -- coronary -- coronary angiography -- pain -- bleeding
Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular Diseases -- nursing -- Periodicals
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Nursing -- Periodicals
Vascular Diseases -- Periodicals
610.7369105 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/eurjcn/issue ↗
http://cnu.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14745151 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1474515113482809 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1474-5151
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725660
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15421.xml