Comparison of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Sensitive and Quantitative Detection of Hazelnuts in Nut Pastes. (23rd November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Piknová, Ľubica; Janská, Veronika; Kuchta, Tomáš; Siekel, Peter
• Is Part Of: Journal of AOAC International. Volume 101:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1864
• Page End: 1867
• Publication Date: 2019-11-23
• Subjects: Agricultural chemistry -- Periodicals; Food -- Analysis -- Periodicals; 543
• DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1060-3271

Abstract

Abstract: Background : Hazelnuts, being a frequent agent of allergenic reactions, need to be detected in food products. Thus, it is necessary to develop and further investigate appropriate methods for detection. Objective : The aim of the study was to compare the analysis of nut pastes (peanut paste spiked with different amounts of hazelnut paste) as a model of contamination of confectionery. Methods : Real-time PCR and sandwich ELISA (RidaScreen Hazelnut Fast Kit) were used. Results : For real-time PCR, LOQ of 2 mg/kg and a quantification range from 2 to 10 000 mg/kg were determined. For ELISA, LOQ of 1 mg/kg and a quantification range from 1 to 100 mg/kg were determined. Conclusions : The comparison shows that the methods had comparable sensitivity with LOQs in the same order of magnitude. Although ELISA was slightly more sensitive, it required dilution of samples at higher concentrations of the analyte because of its narrow quantification range. Results of this study suggest that real-time PCR and ELISA are both suitable methods for the analysis of nut pastes over a wide range of concentrations. Achieved results could be useful for control as well as for technological purposes. Highlights : Real-time PCR analysis of peanut paste spiked with different amounts of hazelnut paste as a model is proposed. Sandwich ELISA analysis of peanut paste spiked with different amounts of hazelnut paste as a model is proposed. The analytical parameters of real-time PCR and ELISA methods are compared.