Comparative Secretomics Gives Access to High Confident Secretome Data: Evaluation of Different Methods for the Determination of Bona Fide Secreted Proteins. Issue 2 (17th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Poschmann, Gereon; Brenig, Katrin; Lenz, Thomas; Stühler, Kai
• Is Part Of: Proteomics. Volume 21:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-17
• Subjects: ectodomain shedding -- method comparison -- quantitative mass spectrometry -- secretome -- unconventional protein secretion; Proteins -- Separation -- Periodicals; Bioinformatics -- Periodicals; Proteomics -- Periodicals; Genomes -- Periodicals; Molecular genetics -- Periodicals; 572.605
• DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202000178
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1615-9853

Abstract

Abstract: Secretome analysis is broadly applied to understand the interplay between cells and their microenvironment. In particular, the unbiased analysis by mass spectrometry‐based proteomics of conditioned medium has been successfully applied. In this context, several approaches have been developed allowing to distinguish proteins actively secreted by cells from proteins derived from culture medium or proteins released from dying cells. Here, three different methods comparing conditioned medium and lysate by quantitative mass spectrometry‐based proteomics to identify bona fide secreted proteins are evaluated. Evaluation in three different human cell lines reveals that all three methods give access to a similar set of bona fide secreted proteins covering a broad abundance range. In the analyzed primary cells, that is, mesenchymal stromal cells and normal human dermal fibroblasts, more than 70% of the identified proteins are linked to classical secretion pathways. Furthermore, 4–12% are predicted to be released by unconventional secretion pathways. Interestingly, evidence of release by ectodomain shedding in a large number of the remaining candidate proteins is found. In summary, it is convinced that comparative secretomics is currently the method of choice to obtain high‐confident secretome data and to identify novel candidates for unconventional protein secretion which have been neglected so far.