Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA. (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Yunji; Aldag, Austin M; Warner, Mildred E
• Is Part Of: Urban studies. Volume 58:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1158
• Page End: 1175
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: corporate interests -- labour rights -- progressive cities -- state pre-emption -- unions; 公司利益 -- 劳工权利 -- 进步城市 -- 州优先立法 -- 工会; Cities and towns -- Periodicals; City planning -- Periodicals; 307.1216
• DOI: 10.1177/0042098020910337
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0042-0980

Abstract

While some US cities and states have taken the lead in protecting labour rights, a counter-trend is found in state pre-emptions – state laws that prohibit cities from making any ordinances or laws related to certain policy areas. What drives these state-level actions that undermine progressive city leadership in the USA? We examine recent state legislations that pre-empt city authority to regulate labour conditions and protect labour rights in the private and public sectors (i.e. minimum wage, paid leave, fair scheduling, right to work, prevailing wage). We use a 50-state regression model to explore what differentiates states with more pre-emption of labour rights and potential sources of pushback. States with low minimum wages, which have never had strong labour protections, pre-empt more. Unions can be sources of pushback – greater unionisation is linked to fewer pre-emptions. However, in Republican-controlled states, more unionisation is linked to more pre-emptions. We use Wisconsin as an example of a state that adopted anti-union policies – despite strong pushback from the public – to explore how strong labour protections can act as a 'trigger' for states to undermine labour rights.