Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Still standardized or on the verge of diversification?. Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Still standardized or on the verge of diversification?. Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Still standardized or on the verge of diversification?
- Authors:
- Sgarbura, Olivia
Villeneuve, Laurent
Alyami, Mohammad
Bakrin, Naoual
Torrent, Juan José
Eveno, Clarisse
Hübner, Martin
Abba, Julio
Afifi, Adnane
Mortensen, Michael Bau
Bharath, G.
Bhatt, Aditi
Yan So, Jimmy Bok
Brandl, Andreas
Ceelen, Wim
Cortes-Guiral, Delia
Courvoiser, Thomas
Coget, Julien
de Hingh, Ignace H.
Delhorme, Jean-Baptiste
Deo, Suryanarayana S.V.
di Giorgio, Andrea
Dumont, Frederic
Escayola, Cecilia
Ezanno, Anne-Cécile
Gagnière, Johan
Galindo, Julio
Glatz, Torben
Jäger, Tarkan
Jarra, Maximilian
Katdare, Ninad
Kepenekian, Vahan
Khomyakov, Vladimir M.
Kothonidis, Konstantinos
Laplace, Nathalie
Lavoue, Vincent
Lehmann, Kuno
Lynch, Craig
Mehta, Sanket
Moldovan, Bogdan
Nissan, Aviram
Nowacki, Maciej
Orry, David
Pérez, Gloria Ortega
Pabst, Urs G.
Paquette, Brice
Paskonis, Marius
Piso, Pompiliu
Pocard, Marc
Rau, Beate
Reymond, Marc
Ris, Frederic
Robella, Manuela
Silvestre-Rodriguez, José
Singh, Shivendra
Somashekhar, S.P.
Soravia, Claudio
Sourrouille, Isabelle
Taibi, Abelkader
Tempfer, Clemens
Torkington, Jared
Vizzielli, Giuseppe
Willaert, Wouter
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: PIPAC is a new treatment modality for peritoneal cancer which has been practiced and evaluated until very recently by few academic centers in a highly standardized manner. Encouraging oncological outcomes and the safety profile have led to widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to assess current PIPAC practice in terms of technique, treatment and safety protocol, and indications. Methods: A standardized survey with 82 closed-ended questions was sent online to active PIPAC centers which were identified by help of PIPAC training centers and the regional distributors of the PIPAC-specific nebulizer. The survey inquired about center demographics (n = 8), technique (n = 34), treatment and safety protocol (n = 34), and indications (n = 6). Results: Overall, 62 out of 66 contacted PIPAC centers answered the survey (response rate 93%). 27 centers had performed >60 PIPAC procedures. A consensus higher than 70% was reached for 37 items (50%), and higher than 80% for 28 items (37.8%). The topics with the highest degree of consensus were safety and installation issues (93.5% and 80.65%) while chemotherapy and response evaluation were the least consensual topics (63.7 and 59.6%). The attitudes were not influenced by volume, PIPAC starting year, type of activity, or presence of peritoneal metastases program. Conclusion: Homogeneous treatment standards of new techniques are important to guarantee safe implementation and practice but also to allow comparisonAbstract: Background: PIPAC is a new treatment modality for peritoneal cancer which has been practiced and evaluated until very recently by few academic centers in a highly standardized manner. Encouraging oncological outcomes and the safety profile have led to widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to assess current PIPAC practice in terms of technique, treatment and safety protocol, and indications. Methods: A standardized survey with 82 closed-ended questions was sent online to active PIPAC centers which were identified by help of PIPAC training centers and the regional distributors of the PIPAC-specific nebulizer. The survey inquired about center demographics (n = 8), technique (n = 34), treatment and safety protocol (n = 34), and indications (n = 6). Results: Overall, 62 out of 66 contacted PIPAC centers answered the survey (response rate 93%). 27 centers had performed >60 PIPAC procedures. A consensus higher than 70% was reached for 37 items (50%), and higher than 80% for 28 items (37.8%). The topics with the highest degree of consensus were safety and installation issues (93.5% and 80.65%) while chemotherapy and response evaluation were the least consensual topics (63.7 and 59.6%). The attitudes were not influenced by volume, PIPAC starting year, type of activity, or presence of peritoneal metastases program. Conclusion: Homogeneous treatment standards of new techniques are important to guarantee safe implementation and practice but also to allow comparison between cohorts and multi-center analysis of merged data including registries. Efforts to avoid diversification of PIPAC practice include regular update of the PIPAC training curriculum, targeted research and a consensus statement. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 47:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 149
- Page End:
- 156
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01
- Subjects:
- ePIPAC -- Technique -- Treatment protocol -- Indications -- Safety -- Peritoneal metastasis -- PRGS
ePIPAC electrostatic Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy -- HIPEC Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy -- ISSPP International Society for the Study of Pleura and Peritoneum -- PIPAC Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy -- PIPAC-CD PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin -- PIPAC-OX PIPAC with oxaliplatin -- PM Peritoneal metastases -- PRGS Peritoneal regression grading score
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15363.xml