Influence of locoregional lymph node aspiration cytology vs sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy on disease stage assignment in dogs with integumentary mast cell tumors. Issue 1 (10th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lapsley, Janis; Hayes, Galina M.; Janvier, Valentin; Newman, Ashleigh W.; Peters‐Kennedy, Jeanine; Balkman, Cheryl; Sumner, Julia P.; Johnson, Philippa
• Is Part Of: Veterinary surgery. Volume 50:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 133
• Page End: 141
• Publication Date: 2020-11-10
• Subjects: Veterinary surgery -- Periodicals; Veterinary Medicine -- Periodicals; Surgery -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; 636.0897
• DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13537
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-3499

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effect of sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology vs locoregional lymph node (LRLN) fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology on assigned disease stage and adjunctive treatment recommendations and describe the incidence of anatomic disparity between the LRLN and SLN. Study design: A pre‐post study refers to a study design type in which subjects are compared pre and post the intervention of interest. Animals: Seventeen dogs undergoing primary excision of 20 cutaneous and subcutaneous mast cell tumors (MCT). Methods: Client‐owned dogs presenting to the Cornell University Hospital for Animals for surgical removal of a cytologically confirmed cutaneous or subcutaneous MCT >1 cm in diameter were enrolled. Cytological examination of FNA from the LRLN was compared with histology of the SLN. The SLN was identified by indirect computed tomographic lymphangiography (ICTL) after peritumoral injection of iopamidol and scanning at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes. Histopathologic node score > 1 was considered metastatic. After case review by an oncologist, LRLN FNA cytology was compared with SLN histology for effect on changes in stage assignment and adjunctive treatment recommendations. Results: Mast cell tumors were graded as 2 low (n = 11), 2 high (n = 2), and subcutaneous (n = 7). Optimal scan timing was 10 minutes after injection of iopamidol. Sentinel lymph node differed anatomically from LRLN in 5 of 18 scans. Metastases were detected by histology in 9 of 20 SLN compared with in 1 of 20 FNA of LRLN ( P = .001), changing stage and adjunctive treatment recommendations 8 of 20 tumors. Only 6 of 19 LRLN FNA samples were diagnostic. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph nodes were consistently identified with ICTL and differed from LRLN in one‐quarter of tumors. Histopathological examination of SLN altered recommendations in half of the dogs compared with the previous standard of care. Clinical significance: Indirect computed tomographic lymphangiography and SLN excision should be considered as a new standard for dogs with MCT.