Beta-binomial models for meta-analysis with binary outcomes: Variations, extensions, and additional insights from econometrics. Issue 2 (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mathes, Tim; Kuss, Oliver
• Is Part Of: Research methods in medicine & health sciences. Volume 2:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 82
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: Meta-analysis -- beta-binomial regression -- negative-binomial regression; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.7205
• DOI: 10.1177/2632084321996225
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2632-0843

Abstract

Background: Meta-analysis of systematically reviewed studies on interventions is the cornerstone of evidence based medicine. In the following, we will introduce the common-beta beta-binomial (BB) model for meta-analysis with binary outcomes and elucidate its equivalence to panel count data models. Methods: We present a variation of the standard "common-rho" BB (BBST model) for meta-analysis, namely a "common-beta" BB model. This model has an interesting connection to fixed-effect negative binomial regression models (FE-NegBin) for panel count data. Using this equivalence, it is possible to estimate an extension of the FE-NegBin with an additional multiplicative overdispersion term (RE-NegBin), while preserving a closed form likelihood. An advantage due to the connection to econometric models is, that the models can be easily implemented because "standard" statistical software for panel count data can be used. We illustrate the methods with two real-world example datasets. Furthermore, we show the results of a small-scale simulation study that compares the new models to the BBST. The input parameters of the simulation were informed by actually performed meta-analysis. Results: In both example data sets, the NegBin, in particular the RE-NegBin showed a smaller effect and had narrower 95%-confidence intervals. In our simulation study, median bias was negligible for all methods, but the upper quartile for median bias suggested that BBST is most affected by positive bias. Regarding coverage probability, BBST and the RE-NegBin model outperformed the FE-NegBin model. Conclusion: For meta-analyses with binary outcomes, the considered common-beta BB models may be valuable extensions to the family of BB models.