Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone–implant interaction. Issue 1 (20th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Quevedo González, Fernando J.; Steineman, Brett D.; Sturnick, Daniel R.; Deland, Jonathan T.; Demetracopoulos, Constantine A.; Wright, Timothy M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of orthopaedic research. Volume 39:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 103
• Page End: 111
• Publication Date: 2020-10-20
• Subjects: bone failure -- finite element analysis -- micromotion -- total ankle arthroplasty; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1002/jor.24876
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-0266

Abstract

Abstract: Finite element (FE) models to evaluate the burden placed on the interaction between total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) implants and the bone often rely on peak axial forces. However, the loading environment of the ankle is complex, and it is unclear whether peak axial forces represent a challenging scenario for the interaction between the implant and the bone. Our goal was to determine how the loads and the design of the fixation of the tibial component of TAA impact the interaction between the implant and the bone. To this end, we developed a framework that integrated robotic cadaveric simulations to determine the ankle kinematics, musculoskeletal models to determine the ankle joint loads, and FE models to evaluate the interaction between TAA and the bone. We compared the bone–implant micromotion and the risk of bone failure of three common fixation designs for the tibial component of TAA: spikes, a stem, and a keel. We found that the most critical conditions for the interaction between the implant and the bone were dependent on the specimen and the fixation design, but always involved submaximal forces and large moments. We also found that while the fixation design influenced the distribution and the peak value of bone–implant micromotion, the amount of bone at risk of failure was specimen dependent. To account for the most critical conditions for the interaction between the implant and the bone, our results support simulating multiple specimens under complex loading profiles that include multiaxial moments and span entire activity cycles.