Reply to Timothy Hinton on Gareth Moore's Philosophy of God. (11th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reply to Timothy Hinton on Gareth Moore's Philosophy of God. (11th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Reply to Timothy Hinton on Gareth Moore's Philosophy of God
- Authors:
- Robinson, Howard
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Hinton's defence of Gareth's philosophy is welcome ‐ but I don't think it works. This is because he does not show how, on Gareth's theory, 'God' can be referential, and, if it is not referential, then 'belief in God' cannot be taken in any literal sense. Sadly, I stand by my original claim that the radical, Phillipsian Wittgensteinianism that Gareth adopts is a form of informal positivism that only allows an expressivist sense to religious, and, indeed, all metaphysical language.
- Is Part Of:
- New Blackfriars. Volume 102:Number 1097(2021)
- Journal:
- New Blackfriars
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Number 1097(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 1097 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 1097
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0102-1097-0000
- Page Start:
- 22
- Page End:
- 29
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-11
- Subjects:
- Wittgenstein -- God -- Reference -- Phillips -- expressivism -- truth
Periodicals
Periodicals
271.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/nbfr?close=2006 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/nbfr.12626 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0028-4289
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6082.270000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15332.xml