235Anatomic guided ablation of the right ganglionated plexus is enough for cardiac autonomic denervation in patients with significant bradyarrhythmias. (18th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Valbom Mesquita, D; Parreira, L; Carmo, P; Amador, P; Cavaco, D; Marinheiro, R; Costa, F; Fonseca, M; Farinha, J; Esteves, A; Pinheiro, A; Lopes, A; Scanavacca, M; Adragao, P
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 22(2020)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2020-06-18
• Subjects: Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa162.339
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In patients with significant bradyarrhytmias, cardiac denervation is an alternative therapeutic approach. Previous reports proposed different methods (as high frequency ednocardial stimulation of ganglionated plexus and specific atrial electrogram identification) and targets (right and left atrial ganglionated plexus) for adequate denervation. There is no consensus on the best way to perform these procedures, in spite the right atrial ganglia plexus (GP) ablation seeming to be the most contributive to its success. Purpose: To assess the results of a purely anatomic approach for ablation of just the right atrial plexus in patients with severe vagal bradyarrhytmias. Methods: We enrolled patients referred for ablation of cardiac parasympathetic ganglia, with or without atrial fibrillation ablation. We performed eletroanatomic mapping of the right and left atria and used an irrigated tip catheter for ablation, aiming at the anterior right GP at the right pulmonary veins antrum along with ablation at the superior vena cava junction and the inferior right GP at the posterior aspect of the right inferior pulmonary vein along with ablation of the right aspect of the interatrial septum, between the posterior wall and coronary sinus ostium (Figure 1). We assessed the PW and Wenckenback cycle lengths (CL) pre and post procedure in patients with sinus arrest or AV block, respectively, and the patients had new 24h holter readings at least 30 days from the index procedure. Results: We enrolled 12 patients: 9 males (75%), median age of 49, 5 years (IQR 36-61, 75). All patients had structurally normal hearts. 7 patients had only ablation of the parasympathetic ganglia and 5 patients had simultaneous pulmonary vein isolation for previously documented atrial fibrillation. 7 patients (58, 3%) had sinus bradycardia (2 patients had sinus arrest with pauses of 8 and 13 seconds), 2 patients with cardioinhibitory syncope (with pauses of 23 and 28 seconds) and 3 patients had transient high degree AV block. The ablation procedure led to a median sinus rate acceleration of 15 bpm (IQR 3-29), a median decrease of 320 ms in PW (IQR 23, 75-609, 5) in patients with sinus arrest and a decrease of 80 ms in wenckenback CL (IQR 60-200) in patients with AV block. With a median follow up of 133, 50 days (IQR 36-61, 75), no patient had recurrence of symptoms or conduction disturbances. Conclusions: In selected patients with severe functional paroxysmal bradyarrhytmias, cardiac denervation using an ablation strategy purely based on anatomic aspects and targeting only the right GP, seems to be an effective therapeutic approach.