489 A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ANASTOMOTIC COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY. (14th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 489 A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ANASTOMOTIC COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY. (14th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- 489 A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ANASTOMOTIC COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY
- Authors:
- Katz, A
Bendayan, S
Hilzenrat, R
L Ramirez-GarciaLuna, J
Kammili, A
Al Lawati, Y
Abureida, F
Nevo, Y
Cools-Lartigue, J
Spicer, J
Mueller, C
Ferri, L - Abstract:
- Abstract: : Post-esophagectomy anastomotic complications can result in high morbidity/mortality. Those with necrosis and sepsis have traditionally resulted in conduit loss and cervical esophagostomy. We sought to examine our management and outcomes of anastomotic complications, with a focus on an approach that stresses conduit salvage. Methods: Conduit complications were identified from a prospectively collected esophagectomy database (2006–17) at a high-volume referral center. Patient/tumor/treatment details and surgical outcomes were collected. Conduit complications were defined as Leak/Conduit Necrosis/Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF) and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Successful treatment was defined when sepsis/leak control was achieved and no further intervention was required. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression, logistic regression, ANOVA or Chi-square tests, *p < 0.05. Results: Of 647 esophagectomies, conduit complications occurred in 103 (16%) [Leak:73 (11%); Necrosis:24 (4%), (TEF):6(1%)]. Antibiotics (C-D = 2) was successful in 28 (38%) of Leaks. Endoscopic stent alone (C-D = 3A) was successful in 20 (27%) Leak, 7(29%) Necrosis, and 1(17%) TEF cases. Early conduit revision+re-anastomosis (C-D = 3B/4) was successfully performed in 22 (30%) Leak, 13 (54%) Necrosis, and 5(83%) TEF cases. Only 6 patients [2(3%) Leak, 4(16%) Necrosis] had conduit loss+cervical esophagostomy. 90-day mortality was: Minor (C-D = 2-3A) Leak = 3%, MajorAbstract: : Post-esophagectomy anastomotic complications can result in high morbidity/mortality. Those with necrosis and sepsis have traditionally resulted in conduit loss and cervical esophagostomy. We sought to examine our management and outcomes of anastomotic complications, with a focus on an approach that stresses conduit salvage. Methods: Conduit complications were identified from a prospectively collected esophagectomy database (2006–17) at a high-volume referral center. Patient/tumor/treatment details and surgical outcomes were collected. Conduit complications were defined as Leak/Conduit Necrosis/Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF) and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Successful treatment was defined when sepsis/leak control was achieved and no further intervention was required. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression, logistic regression, ANOVA or Chi-square tests, *p < 0.05. Results: Of 647 esophagectomies, conduit complications occurred in 103 (16%) [Leak:73 (11%); Necrosis:24 (4%), (TEF):6(1%)]. Antibiotics (C-D = 2) was successful in 28 (38%) of Leaks. Endoscopic stent alone (C-D = 3A) was successful in 20 (27%) Leak, 7(29%) Necrosis, and 1(17%) TEF cases. Early conduit revision+re-anastomosis (C-D = 3B/4) was successfully performed in 22 (30%) Leak, 13 (54%) Necrosis, and 5(83%) TEF cases. Only 6 patients [2(3%) Leak, 4(16%) Necrosis] had conduit loss+cervical esophagostomy. 90-day mortality was: Minor (C-D = 2-3A) Leak = 3%, Major (C-D = 3B-4) Leak = 8%, and Necrosis = 21%*. Necrosis, but not Leak or TEF, was associated with lower 3-year survival compared to patients who did not have conduit complication (30% vs 55%, p < 0.008). Conclusion: The vast majority of conduit complications, including conduit necrosis, can be managed successfully with conduit salvage with endoscopic treatment or early surgical re-anastomosis. Cervical esophagostomy is rarely required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diseases of the esophagus. Volume 33(2020)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Diseases of the esophagus
- Issue:
- Volume 33(2020)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0033-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-14
- Subjects:
- Esophagus -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.32 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2050 ↗
http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1120-8694 ↗
https://academic.oup.com/dote ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/dote/doaa087.125 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-8694
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3598.210000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15325.xml