Gender, Benevolent Sexism, and Public Health Compliance. Issue 4 (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Philip; Farhart, Christina
• Is Part Of: Politics & gender. Volume 16:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 1036
• Page End: 1043
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Gender, -- Benevolent sexism, -- COVID-19, -- Social distancing, -- Physical distancing; Sex role -- Political aspects -- Periodicals; Women in politics -- Periodicals; 320.082
• DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X20000495
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-923X

Abstract

Abstract: Growing research shows a correlation between gender, benevolent sexism, partisanship, and COVID-19 public health compliance. We show first that women are more likely than men to engage in protective behaviors to slow the spread of COVID-19. We also find that while Republicans and Independents are less likely to comply with these measures, benevolent sexism moderates the effect of partisanship and can increase compliance. These results suggest that framing public health directives in terms of chivalry and protection activates benevolent sexism, potentially offsetting patterns of noncompliance associated with partisanship. We discuss the negative consequences of these results and posit a need for bipartisan messages to reduce reliance on benevolent sexism in the future.