Cannabis Edibles: Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Evaluation of Oral Fluid Screening Devices for Predicting Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Oral Fluid following Cannabis Brownie Administration. (6th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cannabis Edibles: Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Evaluation of Oral Fluid Screening Devices for Predicting Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Oral Fluid following Cannabis Brownie Administration. (6th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Cannabis Edibles: Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Evaluation of Oral Fluid Screening Devices for Predicting Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Oral Fluid following Cannabis Brownie Administration
- Authors:
- Newmeyer, Matthew N
Swortwood, Madeleine J
Andersson, Maria
Abulseoud, Osama A
Scheidweiler, Karl B
Huestis, Marilyn A - Abstract:
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Roadside oral fluid (OF) Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) detection indicates recent cannabis intake. OF and blood THC pharmacokinetic data are limited and there are no on-site OF screening performance evaluations after controlled edible cannabis. CONTENT: We reviewed OF and blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and performance evaluations of the Draeger DrugTest ® 5000 (DT5000) and Alere™ DDS ® 2 (DDS2) on-site OF screening devices. We also present data from a controlled oral cannabis administration session. SUMMARY: OF THC maximum concentrations (Cmax ) were similar in frequent as compared to occasional smokers, while blood THC Cmax were higher in frequent [mean (range) 17.7 (8.0–36.1) μg/L] smokers compared to occasional [8.2 (3.2–14.3) μg/L] smokers. Minor cannabinoids Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabivarin and cannabigerol were never detected in blood, and not in OF by 5 or 8 h, respectively, with 0.3 μg/L cutoffs. Recommended performance (analytical sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency) criteria for screening devices of ≥80% are difficult to meet when maximizing true positive (TP) results with confirmation cutoffs below the screening cutoff. TPs were greatest with OF confirmation cutoffs of THC ≥1 and ≥2 μg/L, but analytical sensitivities were <80% due to false negative tests arising from confirmation cutoffs below the DT5000 and DDS2 screening cutoffs; all criteria were >80% with an OF THC ≥5 μg/L cutoff. Performance criteria also were >80% with a blood THCAbstract: BACKGROUND: Roadside oral fluid (OF) Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) detection indicates recent cannabis intake. OF and blood THC pharmacokinetic data are limited and there are no on-site OF screening performance evaluations after controlled edible cannabis. CONTENT: We reviewed OF and blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and performance evaluations of the Draeger DrugTest ® 5000 (DT5000) and Alere™ DDS ® 2 (DDS2) on-site OF screening devices. We also present data from a controlled oral cannabis administration session. SUMMARY: OF THC maximum concentrations (Cmax ) were similar in frequent as compared to occasional smokers, while blood THC Cmax were higher in frequent [mean (range) 17.7 (8.0–36.1) μg/L] smokers compared to occasional [8.2 (3.2–14.3) μg/L] smokers. Minor cannabinoids Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabivarin and cannabigerol were never detected in blood, and not in OF by 5 or 8 h, respectively, with 0.3 μg/L cutoffs. Recommended performance (analytical sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency) criteria for screening devices of ≥80% are difficult to meet when maximizing true positive (TP) results with confirmation cutoffs below the screening cutoff. TPs were greatest with OF confirmation cutoffs of THC ≥1 and ≥2 μg/L, but analytical sensitivities were <80% due to false negative tests arising from confirmation cutoffs below the DT5000 and DDS2 screening cutoffs; all criteria were >80% with an OF THC ≥5 μg/L cutoff. Performance criteria also were >80% with a blood THC ≥5 μg/L confirmation cutoff; however, positive OF screening results might not confirm due to the time required to collect blood after a crash or police stop. OF confirmation is recommended for roadside OF screening. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT02177513 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical chemistry. Volume 63:Number 3(2017)
- Journal:
- Clinical chemistry
- Issue:
- Volume 63:Number 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0063-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 647
- Page End:
- 662
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-06
- Subjects:
- Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals
Biochemistry -- Periodicals
Biochimie -- Périodiques
Diagnostics biologiques -- Périodiques
Biochemistry
Clinical chemistry
Pharmaceutical chemistry
Biochemistry
Laboratory Techniques and Procedures
Klinische chemie
Periodicals
616.075605 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem ↗
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1554929.html ↗
http://www.clinchem.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1373/clinchem.2016.265371 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9147
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15305.xml