Balancing multiple mandates: A case study of public research institutes in South Africa. (20th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kruss, Glenda
• Is Part Of: Science and public policy. Volume 47:Number 2(2020)
• Page Start: 149
• Page End: 160
• Publication Date: 2019-11-20
• Subjects: public research institutes -- South Africa -- interactive capabilities -- inclusive development; Science and state -- Periodicals; 338.926
• DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scz054
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0302-3427

Abstract

Abstract: The role of public research institutes (PRIs) in innovation and development is typically researched as a linked couplet with universities, but there is little empirical research on PRIs specifically. The article investigates how PRIs in late-developing countries balance multiple mandates, shaped by disciplinary fields and historical trajectories, drawing on comparative case studies of five PRIs in South Africa. PRIs succeeded in articulating new and ambitious strategic policies but most struggled to give effect to expanded mandates. The article compares their 'interactive capabilities' by examining the internal and external interface structures and incentive mechanisms created to support and promote interaction with other knowledge producers and users and highlights misalignments at the macro level. National policy will need to promote the development of stronger interactive capabilities if PRIs are to balance their mandate to link to global knowledge flows, grow economic competitiveness, and address complex problems arising from high levels of poverty and inequality.