Mass Spectrometry–Based Escherichia coli H Antigen/Flagella Typing: Validation and Comparison with Traditional Serotyping. (6th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mass Spectrometry–Based Escherichia coli H Antigen/Flagella Typing: Validation and Comparison with Traditional Serotyping. (6th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Mass Spectrometry–Based Escherichia coli H Antigen/Flagella Typing: Validation and Comparison with Traditional Serotyping
- Authors:
- Cheng, Keding
She, Yi-Min
Chui, Huixia
Domish, Larissa
Sloan, Angela
Hernandez, Drexler
McCorrister, Stuart
Ma, Jun
Xu, Bianli
Reimer, Aleisha
Knox, J David
Wang, Gehua - Abstract:
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli H antigen typing with antisera, a useful method for flagella clinical identification and classification, is a time-consuming process because of the need to induce flagella growth and the occurrence of undetermined strains. We developed an alternative rapid and analytically sensitive mass spectrometry (MS) method, termed MS-based H antigen typing (MS-H), and applied it at the protein sequence level for H antigen typing. We also performed a comparison with traditional serotyping on reference strains and clinical isolates. METHODS: On the basis of international guidelines, the analytical selectivity and sensitivity, imprecision, correlation, repeatability, and reproducibility of the MS-H platform was evaluated using reference strains. Comparison of MS-H typing and serotyping was performed using 302 clinical isolates from 5 Canadian provinces, and discrepant results between the 2 platforms were resolved through whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: Repeated tests on reference strain EDL933 demonstrated a lower limit of the measuring interval at the subsingle colony (16.97 μg or 1.465 × 10 7 cells) level and close correlation ( r 2 > 0.99) between cell culture biomass and sequence coverage. The CV was <10.0% among multiple repeats with 4 reference strains. Intra- and interlaboratory tests demonstrated that the MS-H method was robust and reproducible under various sample preparation and instrumentation conditions. Using discrepancy analysis viaAbstract: BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli H antigen typing with antisera, a useful method for flagella clinical identification and classification, is a time-consuming process because of the need to induce flagella growth and the occurrence of undetermined strains. We developed an alternative rapid and analytically sensitive mass spectrometry (MS) method, termed MS-based H antigen typing (MS-H), and applied it at the protein sequence level for H antigen typing. We also performed a comparison with traditional serotyping on reference strains and clinical isolates. METHODS: On the basis of international guidelines, the analytical selectivity and sensitivity, imprecision, correlation, repeatability, and reproducibility of the MS-H platform was evaluated using reference strains. Comparison of MS-H typing and serotyping was performed using 302 clinical isolates from 5 Canadian provinces, and discrepant results between the 2 platforms were resolved through whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: Repeated tests on reference strain EDL933 demonstrated a lower limit of the measuring interval at the subsingle colony (16.97 μg or 1.465 × 10 7 cells) level and close correlation ( r 2 > 0.99) between cell culture biomass and sequence coverage. The CV was <10.0% among multiple repeats with 4 reference strains. Intra- and interlaboratory tests demonstrated that the MS-H method was robust and reproducible under various sample preparation and instrumentation conditions. Using discrepancy analysis via whole genome sequencing, performed on isolates with discrepant results, MS-H accurately identified 12.3% more isolates than conventional serotyping. CONCLUSIONS: MS-H typing of E. coli is useful for fast and accurate flagella typing and could be very useful during E. coli outbreaks. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical chemistry. Volume 62:Number 6(2016)
- Journal:
- Clinical chemistry
- Issue:
- Volume 62:Number 6(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 6 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0062-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 839
- Page End:
- 847
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-06
- Subjects:
- Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals
Biochemistry -- Periodicals
Biochimie -- Périodiques
Diagnostics biologiques -- Périodiques
Biochemistry
Clinical chemistry
Pharmaceutical chemistry
Biochemistry
Laboratory Techniques and Procedures
Klinische chemie
Periodicals
616.075605 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem ↗
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1554929.html ↗
http://www.clinchem.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1373/clinchem.2015.244236 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9147
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15300.xml