Are restricted mean survival time methods especially useful for noninferiority trials?. (April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are restricted mean survival time methods especially useful for noninferiority trials?. (April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Are restricted mean survival time methods especially useful for noninferiority trials?
- Authors:
- Freidlin, Boris
Hu, Chen
Korn, Edward L - Abstract:
- Background: Restricted mean survival time methods compare the areas under the Kaplan–Meier curves up to a timeτ for the control and experimental treatments. Extraordinary claims have been made about the benefits (in terms of dramatically smaller required sample sizes) when using restricted mean survival time methods as compared to proportional hazards methods for analyzing noninferiority trials, even when the true survival distributions satisfy proportional hazardss. Methods: Through some limited simulations and asymptotic power calculations, the authors compare the operating characteristics of restricted mean survival time and proportional hazards methods for analyzing both noninferiority and superiority trials under proportional hazardss to understand what relative power benefits there are when using restricted mean survival time methods for noninferiority testing. Results: In the setting of low-event rates, very large targeted noninferiority margins, and limited follow-up pastτ, restricted mean survival time methods have more power than proportional hazards methods. For superiority testing, proportional hazards methods have more power. This is not a small-sample phenomenon but requires a low-event rate and a large noninferiority margin. Conclusion: Although there are special settings where restricted mean survival time methods have a power advantage over proportional hazards methods for testing noninferiority, the larger issue in these settings is defining appropriateBackground: Restricted mean survival time methods compare the areas under the Kaplan–Meier curves up to a timeτ for the control and experimental treatments. Extraordinary claims have been made about the benefits (in terms of dramatically smaller required sample sizes) when using restricted mean survival time methods as compared to proportional hazards methods for analyzing noninferiority trials, even when the true survival distributions satisfy proportional hazardss. Methods: Through some limited simulations and asymptotic power calculations, the authors compare the operating characteristics of restricted mean survival time and proportional hazards methods for analyzing both noninferiority and superiority trials under proportional hazardss to understand what relative power benefits there are when using restricted mean survival time methods for noninferiority testing. Results: In the setting of low-event rates, very large targeted noninferiority margins, and limited follow-up pastτ, restricted mean survival time methods have more power than proportional hazards methods. For superiority testing, proportional hazards methods have more power. This is not a small-sample phenomenon but requires a low-event rate and a large noninferiority margin. Conclusion: Although there are special settings where restricted mean survival time methods have a power advantage over proportional hazards methods for testing noninferiority, the larger issue in these settings is defining appropriate noninferiority margins. We find the restricted mean survival time methods lacking in these regards. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical trials. Volume 18:Number 2(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical trials
- Issue:
- Volume 18:Number 2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 18, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0018-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 188
- Page End:
- 196
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04
- Subjects:
- Log-rank test -- proportional hazardss -- Cox model -- survival analysis -- randomized clinical trials
615.5072405 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.crdjournal.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1740774520976576 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1740-7745
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15293.xml