Fine‐grained agglutinated elongate columnar stromatolites: Tieling Formation, ca 1420 Ma, North China. Issue 4 (11th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tosti, Fabio; Riding, Robert
• Editors: Pufahl, Peir
• Is Part Of: Sedimentology. Volume 64:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 871
• Page End: 902
• Publication Date: 2016-12-11
• Subjects: Agglutinated -- branching -- China -- elongation -- lamination -- Mesoproterozoic -- microfabric -- morphology -- stromatolite; Sedimentology -- Periodicals; 552.5
• DOI: 10.1111/sed.12336
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0037-0746

Abstract

Abstract: The Mesoproterozoic Tieling Formation, near Jixian, northern China, contains thick beds of vertically branched, laterally elongate, columnar stromatolites. Carbonate mud is the primary component of both the stromatolites and their intervening matrix. Mud abundance is attributed to water column 'whiting' precipitation stimulated by cyanobacterial photosynthesis. Neomorphic microspar gives the stromatolites a 'streaky' microfabric and small mud flakes are common in the matrix. The columns consist of low‐relief, mainly non‐enveloping, laminae that show erosive truncation and well‐defined repetitive lamination. In plan view, the columns form disjunct elongate ridges <10 cm wide separated by narrow matrix‐filled runnels. The stromatolite surfaces were initially cohesive, rather than rigid, and prone to scour, and are interpreted as current aligned microbial mats that trapped carbonate mud. The pervasive ridge–runnel system suggests scale‐dependent biophysical feedback between: (i) carbonate mud supply; (ii) current duration, strength and direction; and (iii) growth and trapping by prolific mat growth. Together, these factors determined the size, morphology and arrangement of the stromatolite columns and their laminae, as well as their branching patterns, alignment and ridge–runnel spacing. Ridge–runnel surfaces resemble ripple mark patterns, but whether currents were parallel and/or normal to stromatolite alignment remains unclear. The formation and preservation of Tieling columns required plentiful supply of carbonate mud, mat‐building microbes well‐adapted to cope with this abundant sediment, and absence of both significant early lithification and bioturbation. These factors were time limited, and Tieling stromatolites closely resemble coeval examples in the Belt‐Purcell Supergroup of Laurentia. The dynamic interactions between mat growth, currents and sediment supply that determined the shape of Tieling columns contributed to the morphotypical diversity that characterizes mid–late Proterozoic branched stromatolites.