Differential involvement of myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers in painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Issue 1 (31st October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Galosi, Eleonora; Di Pietro, Giuseppe; La Cesa, Silvia; Di Stefano, Giulia; Leone, Caterina; Fasolino, Alessandra; Di Lionardo, Andrea; Leonetti, Frida; Buzzetti, Raffaella; Mollica, Cristina; Cruccu, Giorgio; Truini, Andrea
• Is Part Of: Muscle & nerve. Volume 63:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 74
• Publication Date: 2020-10-31
• Subjects: diabetes -- neuropathic pain -- painful neuropathy -- skin biopsy -- small‐fiber neuropathy; Neuromuscular diseases -- Periodicals; Muscles -- Periodicals; Nerves -- Periodicals; 616.74
• DOI: 10.1002/mus.27080
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-639X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We aimed at evaluating the differential involvement of large myelinated Aβ‐, small myelinated Aδ‐, and unmyelinated C‐fibers in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy and how they contribute to neuropathic pain. Methods: We collected clinical and diagnostic test variables in 133 consecutive patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. All patients underwent Aβ‐fiber mediated nerve conduction study, Aδ‐fiber mediated laser‐evoked potentials and skin biopsy mainly assessing unmyelinated C‐fibers. Results: Pure large‐fiber and small‐fiber polyneuropathy were relatively uncommon; conversely mixed‐fiber polyneuropathy was the most common type of diabetic polyneuropathy (74%). The frequency of neuropathic pain was similar in the three different polyneuropathies. Ongoing burning pain and dynamic mechanical allodynia were similarly associated with specific small‐fiber related variables. Conclusions: Diabetic polyneuropathy mainly manifests as a mixed‐fiber polyneuropathy, simultaneously involving Aβ‐, Aδ‐, and C‐fibers. In most patients, neuropathic pain is distinctly associated with small‐fiber damage. The evidence that the frequency of neuropathic pain does not differ across pure large‐, pure small‐, and mixed‐fiber polyneuropathy, raises the possibility that in patients with pure large‐fiber polyneuropathy nociceptive nerve terminal involvement might be undetected by standard diagnostic techniques.