Aerobic Exercise Training and Inducible Inflammation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy, Young Adults. Issue 17 (4th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sloan, Richard P.; Shapiro, Peter A.; McKinley, Paula S.; Bartels, Matthew; Shimbo, Daichi; Lauriola, Vincenzo; Karmally, Wahida; Pavlicova, Martina; Choi, C. Jean; Choo, Tse‐Hwei; Scodes, Jennifer M.; Flood, Pamela; Tracey, Kevin J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Heart Association. Volume 7:Issue 17(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2018-09-04
• Subjects: clinical trial -- exercise training -- inflammation; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010201
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-9980

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Consensus panels regularly recommend aerobic exercise for its health‐promoting properties, due in part to presumed anti‐inflammatory effects, but many studies show no such effect, possibly related to study differences in participants, interventions, inflammatory markers, and statistical approaches. This variability makes an unequivocal determination of the anti‐inflammatory effects of aerobic training elusive. Methods and Results: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training or a wait list control condition followed by 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning on lipopolysaccharide (0, 0.1, and 1.0 ng/mL)‐inducible tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), and on toll‐like receptor 4 in 119 healthy, sedentary young adults. Aerobic capacity by cardiopulmonary exercise testing was measured at study entry (T1) and after training (T2) and deconditioning (T3). Despite a 15% increase in maximal oxygen consumption, there were no changes in inflammatory markers. Additional analyses revealed a differential longitudinal aerobic exercise training effect by lipopolysaccharide level in inducible TNF‐α ( P =0.08) and IL‐6 ( P =0.011), showing T1 to T2 increases rather than decreases in inducible (lipopolysaccharide 0.1, 1.0 versus 0.0 ng/mL) TNF‐α (51% increase, P =0.041) and IL‐6 (42% increase, P =0.11), and significant T2 to T3 decreases in inducible TNF‐α (54% decrease, P =0.007) and IL‐6 (55% decrease, P <0.001). There were no significant changes in either group at the 0.0 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide level for TNF‐α or IL‐6. Conclusions: The failure to support the primary hypotheses and the unexpected post hoc findings of an exercise‐training–induced proinflammatory response raise questions about whether and under what conditions exercise training has anti‐inflammatory effects. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01335737.