Effect of a Triage‐Based Screening Protocol on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Tanzanian Emergency Department: A Prospective Pre‐Post Study. Issue 16 (18th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hertz, Julian T.; Sakita, Francis M.; Kweka, Godfrey L.; Bloomfield, Gerald S.; Bartlett, John A.; Tarimo, Tumsifu G.; Temu, Gloria; Bettger, Janet P.; Thielman, Nathan M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Heart Association. Volume 9:Issue 16(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-08-18
• Subjects: acute coronary syndrome -- emergency department -- screening -- sub‐Saharan Africa -- Tanzania; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016501
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-9980

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Evidence suggests that acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is underdiagnosed in sub‐Saharan Africa. Triage‐based interventions have improved ACS diagnosis and management in high‐income settings but have not been evaluated in sub‐Saharan African emergency departments (EDs). Our objective was to estimate the effect of a triage‐based screening protocol on ACS diagnosis and care in a Tanzanian ED. Methods and Results: All adults presenting to a Tanzanian ED with chest pain or shortness of breath were prospectively enrolled. Treatments and clinician‐documented diagnoses were observed and recorded. In the preintervention phase (August 2018 through January 2019), ACS testing and treatment were dictated by physician discretion, as per usual care. A triage‐based protocol was then introduced, and in the postintervention phase (January 2019 through October 2019), research assistants performed ECG and point‐of‐care troponin I testing on all patients with chest pain or shortness of breath upon ED arrival. Pre‐post analyses compared ACS care between phases. Of 1020 total participants (339 preintervention phase, 681 postintervention phase), mean (SD) age was 58.9 (19.4) years. Six (1.8%) preintervention participants were diagnosed with ACS, versus 83 (12.2%) postintervention participants (odds ratio [OR], 7.51; 95% CI, 3.52–19.7; P <0.001). Among all participants, 3 (0.9%) preintervention participants received aspirin, compared with 50 (7.3%) postintervention participants (OR, 8.45; 95% CI, 3.07–36.13; P <0.001). Conclusions: Introduction of a triage‐based ACS screening protocol in a Tanzanian ED was associated with significant increases in ACS diagnoses and aspirin administration. Additional research is needed to determine the effect of ED‐based interventions on ACS care and clinical end points in sub‐Saharan Africa.