Psychometric Evaluation of an Alternate Scoring for the Remote Associates Test. (4th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beisemann, Marie; Forthmann, Boris; Bürkner, Paul‐Christian; Holling, Heinz
• Is Part Of: Journal of creative behavior. Volume 54:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 751
• Page End: 766
• Publication Date: 2019-01-04
• Subjects: Remote Associates Test -- Latent Semantic Analysis -- compound RAT -- convergent thinking -- creative thinking; Creative ability -- Periodicals; Creativeness -- Abstracts; Creativeness -- Periodicals; Education -- Abstracts; Education -- Periodicals; Créativité -- Périodiques; 153.35
• DOI: 10.1002/jocb.394
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0175

Abstract

Abstract: The Remote Associates Test (RAT; Mednick, 1962; Mednick & Mednick, 1967) is a commonly employed test of creative convergent thinking. The RAT is scored with a dichotomous scoring, scoring correct answers as 1 and all other answers as 0. Based on recent research into the information processing underlying RAT performance, we argued that the dichotomous scoring may lead to a loss of potentially relevant information. Thus, we proposed an alternate scoring based on semantic similarity between the answer given by the participant and the correct solution using Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA; Landauer & Dumais, 1997). We evaluate the psychometric properties of the alternate LSA scoring and found evidence of construct validity for the LSA scoring which was comparable to findings for the standard scoring, but not better as we would have expected. Thus, our expectations that LSA‐based scoring of the RAT counteracts potential information loss were not met. However, LSA based scorings appear to be a promising alternative for hardly solvable RAT items. We conducted additional analyses comparing different RAT item types with regard to their validity as well as evaluating the information uniquely contained in the LSA scoring. Implications of all finding for existing research using RAT items are discussed.