Revision cochlear implantation using a double array device in the post-meningitis ossified cochlea. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shaul, Chanan; Roland, J.Thomas; Sichel, Jean-Yves; Salem, Riki; Perez, Ronen
• Is Part Of: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. Volume 139(2020:Dec.)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Cochlear implants -- Double array device -- Post meningitis hearing loss -- Ossification -- Auditory function; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Oto-rhino-laryngologie -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie -- Périodiques; 618.9209751
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-5876

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To describe the surgical technique and outcome in a series of patients who underwent revision cochlear implantation using a double array or split electrode device. All patients developed ossified cochleae due to meningitis and were functioning poorly with the previous implant. Methods: Four patients between the ages of 4–15 years underwent revision with five double-array cochlear implant devices. One patient underwent bilateral revision surgery. All patients had previous meningitis with CT and MRI imaging studies that demonstrated completely ossified cochleae. The time interval range between the disease and the initial cochlear implantation and was 4 months to 3 years. The patient's data were retrospectively analyzed with emphasis on the surgical technique, the number of electrodes inserted, and the number of active electrodes at follow-up. In addition, pre and post-revision surgery function was compared. Results: The revision surgery was carried out 2–11 years after the initial surgery. Two tunnels, basal and apical, were drilled in the ossified cochlea. In each of the tunnels, 5 to 11 electrodes were inserted. While the number of active electrodes before revision was 0–5, after revision with the double array, it was increased to 8–12, resulting in improved auditory and speech function. Conclusion: Revision cochlear implantation with a double array implant using the two tunnel technique can increase the number of active electrodes. This leads to a better outcome in post-meningitis children with completely ossified cochleae and a poor functioning previous device.