Pulsar radio emission mechanisms: a critique. Issue 4 (27th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Melrose, D B; Rafat, M Z; Mastrano, A
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 500:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 4530
• Page End: 4548
• Publication Date: 2020-10-27
• Subjects: pulsars: general; Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3324
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We consider critically the three most widely favoured pulsar radio emission mechanisms: coherent curvature emission (CCE), beam-driven relativistic plasma emission (RPE), and anomalous Doppler emission (ADE). We assume that the pulsar plasma is 1D, streaming outwards with a bulk Lorentz factor γs ≫ 〈γ〉 − 1 ≳ 1, where 〈γ〉 is the intrinsic spread in the rest frame of the plasma. We argue that the formation of beams in a multicloud model is ineffective in the intrinsically relativistic case for plausible parameters because the overtaking takes too long. We argue that the default choice for the particle distribution in the rest frame is a Jüttner distribution and that relativistic streaming should be included by applying a Lorentz transformation to the rest-frame distribution, rather than the widely assumed relativistically streaming Gaussian distribution. We find that beam-driven wave growth is severely restricted by (a) the wave properties in pulsar plasma, (b) a separation condition between beam and background, and (c) the inhomogeneity of the plasma in the pulsar frame. The growth rate for the kinetic instability is much smaller and the bandwidth of the growing waves is much larger for a Jüttner distribution than for a relativistically streaming Gaussian distribution. No reactive instability occurs at all for a Jüttner distribution. We conclude that none of CCE, RPE, and ADE is tenable as the generic pulsar radio emission mechanism for 'plausible' assumptions about the pulsar plasma.