Nothing Wrong with the Analysis of Clades in Comparative Evolutionary Studies: A Reply to Poe et al. (26th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baker, Joanna; Meade, Andrew; Pagel, Mark; Venditti, Chris
• Editors: Harmon, Luke
• Is Part Of: Systematic biology. Volume 70:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 197
• Page End: 201
• Publication Date: 2020-08-26
• Subjects: Biology -- Classification -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Biologie -- Classification -- Périodiques; Biologie -- Périodiques; 578.012
• DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1063-5157

Abstract

Abstract: In a recent paper, Poe et al. assert that scientists should abandon clade-based approaches, particularly those using named taxonomic ranks. Poe et al. attempt to demonstrate that clade selection can have effects on the results of evolutionary analyses but unfortunately fall short of making any robust conclusions. Here, we demonstrate that the assertions made by Poe et al. have two important flaws: (i) an erroneous view of modern phylogenetic comparative methods; and (ii) a lack of statistical rigor in their analyses. We repeat Poe et al.'s analysis but using appropriate phylogenetic comparative approaches. We demonstrate that results remain consistent regardless of the clade definition. We go on to discuss the value of taxonomic groupings and how they can provide meaningful units of comparison in evolutionary study. Unlike the disheartening suggestion to abandon the use of clades, scientists can instead continue to use phylogenetic " corrections " that are already the standard for most comparative evolutionary analyses. [Comparative methods; evolution; phylogeny; taxonomy.]