170 Years of "Lock-and-Key": Genital Morphology and Reproductive Isolation. (10th December 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Masly Masly, John P. John P.
• Other Names: Kopp Kopp Artyom Artyom Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of evolutionary biology. Volume 2012(2012)
• Publication Date: 2011-12-10
• Subjects: Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Biological Evolution; Biological Phenomena; Evolution (Biology); Electronic journals; Periodical; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 576.805
• DOI: 10.1155/2012/247352
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-8032

Abstract

Abstract : The divergent genital morphology observed among closely related animal species has long been posited as a mechanism of reproductive isolation. Despite the intuitive appeal that rapidly evolving genitalia might cause speciation, evidence for its importance—or even its potential—in reproductive isolation is mixed. Most tests of genital structural isolation between species often fail to find convincing evidence that differences in morphology prevent copulation or insemination between species. However, recent work suggests that differences in genital morphology might contribute to reproductive isolation in less obvious ways through interactions with sensory mechanisms that result in lowered reproductive fitness in heterospecific matings. In this paper, I present a brief history of the "lock-and-key" hypothesis, summarize the evidence for the involvement of genital morphology in different mechanisms of reproductive isolation, discuss progress in identifying the molecular and genetic bases of species differences in genital morphology, and discuss prospects for future work on the role of genitalia in speciation.