Turbulent flow in a square cross-sectioned bubble column computed by a scale-resolving Reynolds-stress model. (2nd February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ullrich, M.; Krumbein, B.; Maduta, R.; Jakirlić, S.
• Is Part Of: Chemical engineering science. Volume 230(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02-02
• Subjects: Bubble column -- Two-fluid model -- Second moment closure -- Scale-resolving URANS method; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Génie chimique -- Périodiques; Chemical engineering; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 660
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116201
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-2509

Abstract

Highlights: Conventional RANS and a scale-resolving RSMs are applied to a bubbly-column reactor. The latter model results in a correspondingly large fraction of resolved turbulence. Mean flow and turbulence fields of carrier/dispersed phases are correctly captured. RANS-RSM returns good results, unlike the RANS-EVM resulting in a flow asymmetry. Some BIT model terms are applied in conjunction with RANS-RSM and RANS-EVM. Abstract: The present study focuses on the computations of turbulent flow in a square cross-sectioned bubble column by utilizing the two-fluid model (TFM) in conjunction with advanced Reynolds-stress models (RSMs) within the Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) framework. The use of such an advanced modeling approach in combination with the TFM, rarely employed for two-phase flow computations, is motivated by its inherent capability of resolving both Reynolds-stress anisotropy and stress-dissipation anisotropy, also of the corresponding residual turbulence. The presently adopted RSMs are based on the formulation proposed initially by Jakirlić and Hanjalić (2002) for incompressible single-phase flows. Two different RSM versions (Jakirlić and Maduta (2015)), both based on the homogeneous dissipation ( ε h ) concept that employs the specific dissipation rate ( ω h = ε h / k ) as the length-scale-determining variable, are applied in the present work. The baseline model version is formulated within the conventional RANS framework, whereas the advanced model represents an instability-sensitized, eddy-resolving RSM variant, capable of adequately capturing the fluctuating turbulent motion in accordance with the SAS methodology (Scale-Adaptive Simulation) proposed by Menter and Egorov (2010). The results obtained by both RSMs are discussed along with the corresponding experimental database made available by Deen and co-workers (Deen et al., 2000, 2001; Deen, 2001). Additionally, the most-widely used modeling approach for two-phase flows is followed by utilizing the Standard high-Reynolds number k - ε model for the purpose of a comparative assessment. Furthermore, both RANS models are extended by two different proposals for a model term accounting for the so-called bubble-induced turbulence (BIT). The model equations are implemented into the open source software OpenFOAM® based on the finite-volume method on unstructured meshes. The results obtained exhibit high level of agreement with the experimental reference demonstrating high potential of both Reynolds-stress models in computing the bubbly flows. This relates in particular to the correspondingly captured resolved turbulence intensity in this bubble-plume-induced unstable flow event, leading subsequently to a correctly returned velocity field. The mean flow asymmetry, characterizing the baseline Eddy-Viscosity Model (EVM) performance was remedied only after introducing the BIT-related source term contributing appropriately to intensified turbulence production.