P0751METFORMIN, A CLASSIC TREATMENT FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES WITH POSSIBLE RENOPROTECTIVE EFFECTS. (6th June 2020) - Acosta Barrios, Adriana
Abstract: Background and Aims: Metformin is the antidiabetic of choice in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Experimental studies and clinical observations have shown that metformin could have a beneficial effect on the progression of kidney disease through the activation of cAMP due to its anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and anti-oxidative action. The objective was to compare the progression of CKD in diabetic patients with or without metformin as antidiabetic in their treatment and the prevalence of cardiovascular events in both groups. Method: Unicentric retrospective observational analysis. Inclusion criteria: outpatients seen in nephrology consultation during the year of 2012 with diabetes mellitus and stage 3 CKD. Renal, cardiovascular outcomes and mortality were analyzed between patients treated with / without metformin. Median follow-up of 76.5 months (41-84). Renal end-point: estimated glomerular filtration rate drop (MDRD-4) by 50% and / or start of dialysis program. Cardiovascular end-point: ischemic heart disease, stroke, arterial revascularization and / or amputation. Cardiovascular or any cause mortality. Results: 148 patients (96M, 52W) with a mean age of 75±9 years and an eGFR of 40±9 ml / min / 1.73 m2 were included. In relation to hypoglycemic therapy: 45 received metformin, 61 insulin and 31 DPP4i. 80% received treatment with RAAS blockers. After the follow-up, the progression of the renal disease was greater in patients who did not receive metformin: eGFR fall of -7.0±16 vs -0.15±16 ml / min in those treated with metformin (p = 0.019). 25 patients in the group without metformin suffered a renal event vs. 5 in the metformin group (logRank: 4.186, p = 0.045). In the Cox analysis, metformin treatment decreases the progression of kidney disease in a model adjusted for baseline renal function and treatment with RAASB (HR 0.368, p = 0.043), losing its predictive power in a proteinuria-adjusted model. During the follow-up, 45 patients died (20 metformin, 25 non-metformin) and 45 patients suffered a cardiovascular event (15 metformin, 30 non-metformin), with no differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Metformin treatment in patients with stage 3 CKD could slow the progression of CKD, this effect should be demonstrated in randomized studies with larger sample size.