P1527SURVIVAL COMPARISON:HEMODIALYSIS VS PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: TEN YEARS OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. (6th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Terlizzi, Vincenzo; Lucca, Bernardo; Manenti, Chiara; Gaggia, Paola; Zubani, Roberto; Pola, Alessandra; Vizzardi, Valerio; Sandrini, Massimo; Movilli, Ezio; Scolari, Francesco
• Is Part Of: Nephrology dialysis transplantation. Volume 35(2020)Supplement 3
• Publication Date: 2020-06-06
• Subjects: Nephrology -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Transplantation -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis; Kidneys -- Transplantation; Nephrology; Periodicals; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.P1527
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0931-0509

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Survival comparison between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) is still controversial. While some retrospective studies have shown better survival in PD, particularly in the first year, others have not identified this difference. The only RCT published so far showed a 3-year mortality rate similar between two groups. However, the number of patients was too small to provide sufficient statistical power to identify any survival differences between the two dialysis techniques. Aim of this study was to compare HD and PD in term of survival rate and factors possibly involved in a ten-years observational study. Method: We retrospectively evaluated all the incident patients that started a dialytic treatment, either HD or PD, due to uremia from 01-01-2008 to 31-12-2018 at the U.O. Nephrology ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia. Exclusion criteria were: duration of dialysis treatment less than 3 months, and previous dialytic treatment or kidney transplantation. For each patient anthropometric, clinical-anamnestic data and comorbidities at dialysis start were recorded. Results: One thousand and six patients were identified. 130 patients were excluded due to dialysis treatment less than 3 months. A total 876 patients were analyzed. 77% of patients started dialysis on HD while 23% chose PD. Age was significantly higher in HD patients (69±15 vs 65±16 years; p<0.05). No differences were found in the incidence of: ischemic heart disease (HD 24%, PD 25%, p=0.90), diabetes (32% vs 32%, p=0.83), cancer (20% vs 17%, p=0.37), cardiac arrhythmia (20% vs 25%, p=0.08) and peripheral vascular disease (25% vs 25%, p=0.89). An increased incidence of COPD (HD 17% vs PD 8%, p<0.05) and hypertension (73% vs 87%, p<0.05) was present in PD patients. During follow-up, 17% of patients treated with PD shifted to HD due to catheter malfunction, recurrent infections, insufficient dialytic adequacy or ultrafiltration failure. Kidney transplants were performed more frequently in PD patients (HD 12%; PD 24%, p<0.05). At an intention to treat analysis of the data, univariate analysis showed better survival in PD patients (p<0.05, Figure 1). This difference was not confirmed at multivariate analysis (Figure 2), where age, cardiac arrhythmia, cirrhosis, diabetes and peripheral vascular disease were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. No independent influence on mortality of the dialysis treatment modality was found. Conclusion: This ten years observational study shows that HD and PD are similar in term of patient survival. Age and comorbidities seem to play the most important role in patient survival.