0088 Gravity Dreams Following a Virtual Reality Flight Simulation. (27th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Picard-Deland, C; Pastor, M; Solomonova, E; Paquette, T; Nielsen, T
• Is Part Of: Sleep. Volume 43(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A35
• Page End: A36
• Publication Date: 2020-05-27
• Subjects: Sleep -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; Sommeil -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Sommeil, Troubles du -- Périodiques; Sleep disorders; Sleep -- Physiological aspects; Sleep -- physiological aspects; Sleep Wake Disorders; Psychophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.8498
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.086
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-8105

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Flying is a prevalent but infrequent experience in dreams. Despite a broad interest in such unique dream experiences, there is still no experimental procedure for reliably inducing them. Our study aimed 1) to induce flying dreams in the laboratory using virtual reality (VR), 2) to examine phenomenological correlates of flying dreams, such as lucidity and emotions and 3) to investigate the dynamics of dreamed gravity imagery in relation to participant state and trait factors. Methods: A total of 137 healthy participants (24.01±4.03 y.o.; 85 F; 52 M) took part in a custom-built immersive VR task in which they learn how to 'fly' as precisely and quickly as possible, engaging vestibular, motor and visuo-spatial systems. Dreams were collected a) from home dream journals for 5 days before and 10 days after the laboratory VR task and b) after a 90-min morning nap in laboratory. Dream reports were scored by 2 independent judges for flying and other gravity-related imagery. Linear mixed models statistics were used to compare dreams from this cohort with a separate control cohort (N=52) that followed a similar protocol in the same lab but did not undertake a virtual flying task. Results: The VR task successfully increased the likelihood of experiencing flying in dreams from both the laboratory nap (7.1%) and the following night (10.6%) compared to baseline (1.3%) and the control cohort on those days (Lab: 2.4%; following night: 0%). In contrast, the occurrence of other gravity imagery showed no differences. Flying dreams were altered qualitatively, exhibiting higher levels of lucid-control and emotional intensity after VR exposure. Moreover, various factors such as sex, prior dream experiences and sensory immersion in VR differentially modulated flying dream induction. Conclusion: Our findings provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into flying dreams that may facilitate understanding of these typical dream experiences and future developments in dream flight-induction technologies. Support: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada