Genetic differences between bipolar disorder subtypes: A systematic review focused in bipolar disorder type II. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Almeida, Hugo Sérgio; Mitjans, Marina; Arias, Barbara; Vieta, Eduard; Ríos, José; Benabarre, Antonio
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 118(2020)
• Page Start: 623
• Page End: 630
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Bipolar disorder type II -- Bipolar spectrum disorders -- Candidate-gene studies -- Genome-wide association studies; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Ethology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques; Comportement humain -- Périodiques; Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Animal behavior; Human behavior; Neurology; Psychophysiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 573.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7634

Abstract

Highlights: Bipolar disorder subtypes share pathophysiologic pathways on candidate-gene studies. Subtype II has specific contributions of gene interactions and low-effect alleles. In genome studies, subtypes contrasted in their relation to depression and psychosis. Polygenic risk scores were able to differentiate bipolar disorder type II. Research suggests transdiagnostic genetic backgrounds across the bipolar spectrum. Abstract: Background: The identification of bipolar disorder (BD) type II patients has both treatment and prognostic implications. Better understanding of its underlying genetics may yield useful diagnostic tools. Methods: A systematic review on BDII genetics was done using articles published in 2009–2019, following PRISMA recommendations. Results: The most studied polymorphism was BDNF Val66Met with several gene-gene interactions within the dopaminergic system. Associations were reported within the monoaminergic systems ( DRD3, ADH1B and SLC6A4), calcium ( CACNB2 and CACNG2 ) and cAMP ( PDE1DA, PDE4B and DISC1 ) signal transduction pathways and the immune system ( TNFα, IFNδ and IL-10 ). Chromosomes 2, 3 and 10 were associated with BDII and polygenic risk scores distinguished between BD subtypes and with major depressive disorder. Conclusions: Research on BDII stems from BDI findings, however with a stronger contribution of gene-gene interactions and low-effect alleles on known neuroplasticity and monoaminergic system genes. Genome studies point to transdiagnostic backgrounds, with wider associations across bipolar spectrum disorders. Findings able to accurately differentiate BDII remain elusive, dependent on better phenotypic characterization and new research methods.