The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks. Issue 5 (14th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks. Issue 5 (14th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks
- Authors:
- Conger, Aaron
Burnham, Taylor
Salazar, Fabio
Tate, Quinn
Golish, Mathew
Petersen, Russell
Cunningham, Shellie
Teramoto, Masaru
Kendall, Richard
McCormick, Zachary L - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Although the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of zygapophyseal joint (z-joint)–mediated low back pain has been characterized, few studies have described outcomes in patients selected using a guideline-concordant paradigm of ≥80% pain relief with dual comparative medial branch blocks (MBBs). We investigated long-term treatment outcomes of patients selected according to this paradigm. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods: The medical records of 111 consecutive patients were reviewed; 85 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was used to capture current numerical rating scale (NRS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore associations between the primary outcome and covariates, including age, duration of pain, presence of scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and >75% disc height loss. Results: At six to 12, 12–24, and >24 months, 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41–85%), 65.6% (95% CI = 49–82%), and 44.1% (95% CI = 27–61%) of patients reported a ≥50% pain reduction ( P = 0.170), respectively. At a minimum of six months, 70.6% of patients reported a pain reduction of two or more points (minimally clinically important change), and 54.1% reported a PGIC score consistent with "much improved" or better.Abstract: Objectives: Although the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of zygapophyseal joint (z-joint)–mediated low back pain has been characterized, few studies have described outcomes in patients selected using a guideline-concordant paradigm of ≥80% pain relief with dual comparative medial branch blocks (MBBs). We investigated long-term treatment outcomes of patients selected according to this paradigm. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods: The medical records of 111 consecutive patients were reviewed; 85 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was used to capture current numerical rating scale (NRS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore associations between the primary outcome and covariates, including age, duration of pain, presence of scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and >75% disc height loss. Results: At six to 12, 12–24, and >24 months, 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41–85%), 65.6% (95% CI = 49–82%), and 44.1% (95% CI = 27–61%) of patients reported a ≥50% pain reduction ( P = 0.170), respectively. At a minimum of six months, 70.6% of patients reported a pain reduction of two or more points (minimally clinically important change), and 54.1% reported a PGIC score consistent with "much improved" or better. Older age and a smaller Cobb angle were associated with a ≥50% pain reduction ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Lumbar medial branch RFA is an effective, durable treatment for a significant proportion of patients with recalcitrant lumbar z-joint pain when candidacy is determined by the guideline-concordant paradigm of ≥80% pain relief with dual comparative MBBs. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain medicine. Volume 21:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- Pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0021-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 902
- Page End:
- 909
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-14
- Subjects:
- Low Back Pain -- Zygapophyseal -- Scoliosis -- Lumbar -- Chronic -- Spondylolisthesis
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesics -- Periodicals
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain Management -- Periodicals
Douleur -- Périodiques
Douleur -- Traitement -- Périodiques
Analgésiques -- Périodiques
Analgésique
Soulagement de la douleur
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1526-2375;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1526-4637 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=pme ↗
http://painmedicine.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/pm/pnz248 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1526-2375
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.806000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15181.xml