Reading alchemically: guides to 'philosophical' practice in early modern England. (2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rampling, Jennifer M.
• Editors: Leong, Elaine; Creager, Angela; Grote, Mathias
• Is Part Of: BJHS Themes. Volume 5(2020)
• Page Start: 57
• Page End: 74
• Publication Date: 2020
• Subjects: Science -- Historiography -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 507.22
• DOI: 10.1017/bjt.2020.3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2058-850X

Abstract

Abstract: Dozens of early modern treatises claim to offer straightforward instructions on the theory and practice of alchemy, including all the steps necessary to produce the philosophers' stone and a range of medicinal elixirs. Yet the resulting works often seem to obfuscate more than they explain: omitting vital information, disguising ingredients and practices behind cover names, and describing outcomes that seem, to modern eyes, impossible. Were such 'instruction manuals' ever intended to offer guides for actual practice, or did they serve other ends – from attracting patrons to persuading sceptics of the truth of alchemy? Drawing upon alchemical dialogues written, compiled and annotated by English alchemists in the late fifteenth and the sixteenth centuries, I argue that these works of 'philosophical' alchemy could indeed serve as technical manuals, although not always of the kind we might expect. Such writings offer advice not only on practical techniques, but also on the process of reading alchemically: guiding readers through the exegetical minefield of alchemical writing, in order both to extract meaningful chemical recipes from obscure texts, and to craft the practitioner's own persona as an alchemical philosopher.