Direct Comparison of Multidimensional Clinical Assessment Tools: Sensitivity to Concussion in Student Athletes. (26th July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Direct Comparison of Multidimensional Clinical Assessment Tools: Sensitivity to Concussion in Student Athletes. (26th July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Direct Comparison of Multidimensional Clinical Assessment Tools: Sensitivity to Concussion in Student Athletes
- Authors:
- Wilmoth, K
Mau, K
Guzowski, N
Brett, B
McCrea, M
Nelson, L - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: Consensus guidelines recommend multidimensional assessment for concussion diagnosis and management. Among cognitive, oculomotor, and postural stability, it remains unclear which modalities perform best in the acute/subacute periods. We conducted a direct comparison to identify those with the strongest sensitivity to sport-related concussion. Methods: High school and collegiate football players (aged 14–24) completed preseason baseline assessments. Concussed (n=91) and matched non-concussed teammates (n=85) underwent repeat testing at 48 hours, 8 days, and 15 days post-injury. Postconcussive symptoms (SCAT-3 symptom severity), cognition (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing, Trail Making Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Processing Speed Index), oculomotor functioning (King-Devick Test), and postural stability (Balance Error Scoring System) were compared using Cohen's d and Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses. Results: Symptom severity had the greatest sensitivity at 48 hours and 8 days post-injury (Cohen's d=1.43 and 0.53, AUC=.93 and .63, p<.01). Of the performance-based assessments, BESS was most sensitive to SRC at 48 hours post-injury (Cohen's d=.74, AUC=.70, p<.01). Oculomotor and cognitive testing via ImPACT, WAIS-IV PSI, and TMT-A were sensitive to a lesser degree (Cohen's d=.35–.58, p<.05). Verbal memory was the only significant performance-based assessment at days 8 and 15, withAbstract: Purpose: Consensus guidelines recommend multidimensional assessment for concussion diagnosis and management. Among cognitive, oculomotor, and postural stability, it remains unclear which modalities perform best in the acute/subacute periods. We conducted a direct comparison to identify those with the strongest sensitivity to sport-related concussion. Methods: High school and collegiate football players (aged 14–24) completed preseason baseline assessments. Concussed (n=91) and matched non-concussed teammates (n=85) underwent repeat testing at 48 hours, 8 days, and 15 days post-injury. Postconcussive symptoms (SCAT-3 symptom severity), cognition (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing, Trail Making Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Processing Speed Index), oculomotor functioning (King-Devick Test), and postural stability (Balance Error Scoring System) were compared using Cohen's d and Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses. Results: Symptom severity had the greatest sensitivity at 48 hours and 8 days post-injury (Cohen's d=1.43 and 0.53, AUC=.93 and .63, p<.01). Of the performance-based assessments, BESS was most sensitive to SRC at 48 hours post-injury (Cohen's d=.74, AUC=.70, p<.01). Oculomotor and cognitive testing via ImPACT, WAIS-IV PSI, and TMT-A were sensitive to a lesser degree (Cohen's d=.35–.58, p<.05). Verbal memory was the only significant performance-based assessment at days 8 and 15, with small-to-medium effect sizes (Cohen's d=.37 and .44, p<.05). Other cognitive measures (SAC, TMT-B) were not sensitive to SRC across timepoints (p>.05). Conclusion: We observed heterogeneity in clinical assessment performance such that the clinical domains strongest in the initial days post-injury (symptom severity, balance) were less sensitive at later follow-up, supporting the potential need for multidimensional assessment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Archives of clinical neuropsychology. Volume 34:Number 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Archives of clinical neuropsychology
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0034-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 737
- Page End:
- 737
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07-26
- Subjects:
- Clinical neuropsychology -- Periodicals
616.805 - Journal URLs:
- http://acn.oxfordjournals.org/?code=acn&.cgifields=code&homepage.x=152&homepage.y=14 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/08876177 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/arclin/acz026.07 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0887-6177
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1634.090000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15170.xml