High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses. Issue 11 (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses. Issue 11 (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain
- Authors:
- Taylor, Rod S.
Bentley, Anthony
Campbell, Bruce
Murphy, Kieran - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: There is good evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for reducing chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). SENZA randomized controlled trial showed high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) is clinically superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Undertake cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analysis of 10 kHz-SCS compared with LF-SCS. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree and Markov decision analytic model was used to synthesize data on CBLP outcomes and costs over a 15-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service perspective using data from the SENZA randomized controlled trial and other publications. Results are expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in 2016 Pounds Sterling. Results: 10 kHz-SCS is cost-saving and cost-effective compared with LF-SCS, with mean cost-savings of £7170 (95% confidence interval: £6767-£7573) and £3552 (95% confidence interval: £3313-£3792) per patient compared with nonrechargeable and rechargeable LF-SCS devices, respectively. 10 kHz-SCS has a 95% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20, 000 per QALY. Our findings were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: There is a strong economic case for choosing 10 kHz-SCS over LF-SCS for CBLP. Furthermore, 10 kHz-SCS has clinical advantages not captured in our analysis, including shorter, and more predictable procedure times. Abstract : SupplementalAbstract : Objectives: There is good evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for reducing chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). SENZA randomized controlled trial showed high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) is clinically superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Undertake cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analysis of 10 kHz-SCS compared with LF-SCS. Methods: A probabilistic decision tree and Markov decision analytic model was used to synthesize data on CBLP outcomes and costs over a 15-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service perspective using data from the SENZA randomized controlled trial and other publications. Results are expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in 2016 Pounds Sterling. Results: 10 kHz-SCS is cost-saving and cost-effective compared with LF-SCS, with mean cost-savings of £7170 (95% confidence interval: £6767-£7573) and £3552 (95% confidence interval: £3313-£3792) per patient compared with nonrechargeable and rechargeable LF-SCS devices, respectively. 10 kHz-SCS has a 95% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20, 000 per QALY. Our findings were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: There is a strong economic case for choosing 10 kHz-SCS over LF-SCS for CBLP. Furthermore, 10 kHz-SCS has clinical advantages not captured in our analysis, including shorter, and more predictable procedure times. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical journal of pain. Volume 36:Issue 11(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical journal of pain
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 11 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0036-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- spinal cord stimulation -- economic evaluation -- back and leg pain -- cost-utility
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesia -- Periodicals
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.8.1a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=KBIDFPKNAEDDLKHNNCOKIBOBIMNEAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.2.14.27%7c629%7c50 ↗
http://www.clinicalpain.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000866 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0749-8047
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.294200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15149.xml